Indexed in Journament

international journal of heat and technology

ISSN 03928764· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,857 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
207 Articles
Scores higher than 52.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of heat and technology
Abbreviated Name international journal of heat and technology
ISSN 03928764

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 81.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of heat and technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 81.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (207)

2014
improved irritative voiding symptoms three years after stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Vol. 4 , pp. -
507 views DOI Abstract
2020
association between the microsatellite instability status and the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastric cancer
Vol. 9 , pp. -
502 views DOI Abstract
2016
proctitis one week after stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: implications for clinical trial design
Vol. 6 , pp. -
492 views DOI Abstract
2020
2013
immunotherapy of invasive fungal infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients
Vol. 3 , pp. -
415 views DOI Abstract
2012
2020
association between the microsatellite instability status and the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastric cancer
Vol. 9 , pp. -
502 views DOI Abstract
2020
sucralose promotes colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk in a murine model along with changes in microbiota
Vol. 10 , pp. -
160 views DOI Abstract
2020
amino acid oncometabolism and immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment in lung cancer
Vol. 10 , pp. -
401 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019
standardization of sequencing coverage depth in ngs: recommendation for detection of clonal and subclonal mutations in cancer diagnostics
Vol. 9 , pp. -
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
low-dose vs. high-dose cisplatin: lessons learned from 59 chemoradiotherapy trials in head and neck cancer
Vol. 9 , pp. -
346 views DOI Abstract
2018
l-lactate transport and metabolism in mitochondria of hep g2 cells—the cori cycle revisited
Vol. 8 , pp. -
161 views DOI
2018
a phase ib/ii study of ganetespib with doxorubicin in advanced solid tumors including relapsed-refractory small cell lung cancer
Vol. 8 , pp. -
329 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,857 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.