international journal of heat and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#137 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 小时前

international journal of heat and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
索引数
scopus
简称 international journal of heat and technology
缩写名称 international journal of heat and technology
ISSN 03928764
宗旨与范围
URL
作者须知
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (207 total)

2020
clinical implications of plasma epstein–barr virus dna in children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy
;Wenze Qiu;Wenze Qiu;Xing Lv;Xiang Guo;Yawei Yuan
Vol. 10 , pp. -
432 views DOI Abstract
2014
improved irritative voiding symptoms three years after stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
;Zakie eRana;Robyn A Cyr;Leonard N Chen;Brian S Kim;Rudy A Moures;Thomas M Yung;Siyuan eLei;Brian Timothy Collins;Simeng eSuy;Anatoly eDritschilo;John H Lynch;Sean P Collins
Vol. 4 , pp. -
431 views DOI Abstract
2016
the impact of l-dex® measurements in assessing breast cancer related lymphedema (bcrl) as part of routine clinical practice
;Alison L. Laidley, MD;Beth V. Anglin, MD
Vol. 6 , pp. -
424 views DOI Abstract
2016
proctitis one week after stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: implications for clinical trial design
;Ima Paydar;Robyn A Cyr;Thomas M Yung;Siyuan Lei;Brian Timothy Collins;Leonard N Chen;Simeng Suy;Anatoly Dritschilo;John H Lynch;Sean P. Collins
Vol. 6 , pp. -
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
association between the microsatellite instability status and the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with gastric cancer
;Dongfang Dai;Dongfang Dai;Xiaohui Zhao;Xiaoqin Li;Yongqian Shu;Bo Shen;Xiaofeng Chen;Deyu Chen;Deqiang Wang;Deqiang Wang
Vol. 9 , pp. -
416 views DOI Abstract
2020
roles of micrornas in ovarian cancer tumorigenesis: two decades later, what have we learned?
;Ali A. Alshamrani
Vol. 10 , pp. -
347 views DOI Abstract
2015
corrigendum: training global oncologists: addressing the global cancer control problem
;Adam eOlson
Vol. 5 , pp. -
336 views DOI
2012
preclinical evaluation of racotumomab, an anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody to n-glycolyl-containing gangliosides, with or without chemotherapy in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancer
;Valeria I Segatori;Ana María Vazquez;Daniel E. Gomez;Mariano R. Gabri;Daniel F Alonso
Vol. 2 , pp. -
330 views DOI Abstract
2013
immunotherapy of invasive fungal infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients
;Thomas eLehrnbecher;Stanislaw eSchmidt;Lars eTramsen;Thomas eKlingebiel
Vol. 3 , pp. -
327 views DOI Abstract
2018
Passive cooling influencing factors and formation mechanism analysis of the street space in Huizhou traditional dwellings
Zheng B.
Vol. 36 , pp. 1318-1322
321 views DOI
View All 207 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.