organic process research and development | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2360 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

organic process research and development

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name organic process research and development
Abbreviated Name organic process research and development
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (48 total)

2008
An integrated high-throughput screening approach for purification of solid organic compounds by trituration and crystallization in solvents
Tan, H.
Vol. 12 , pp. 58-65
318 views DOI
2013
employees’ performance contribution to the growth of the company on the emerging markets – a managerial approach
;Raluca Ioana Vosloban
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 53-62
294 views Abstract
2019
Scalable Process Design for a PDE10A Inhibitor Consisting of Pyrazolopyrimidine and Quinoxaline as Key Units
Yamagami, T.
Vol. 23 , pp. 578-587
282 views DOI
2013
innovative clusters in times of economic crisis. case study romania
;Carmen Beatrice Păuna
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 105-116
270 views Abstract
2019
Green Chemistry Articles of Interest to the Pharmaceutical Industry
Braun, M.
Vol. 23 , pp. 1118-1133
256 views DOI
2019
Practical Synthesis of Polymethylated Flavones: Nobiletin and Its Desmethyl Derivatives
Asakawa T.
Vol. 23 , pp. 595-602
251 views DOI
2019
Efficient Azacycle Formations Developed in Japanese Pharmaceutical Industries: Elegancy, Logistics, and Training (ELT) "sandwich" for Process Chemists
Mizufune, H.
Vol. 23 , pp. 419-442
250 views DOI
2012
an analysis on the money demand dependence relative to gdp and the interest rate for romania during 2001-2011
;Catalin Angelo Ioan;Gina Ioan
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 147-156
241 views Abstract
2015
Dithiocarbamates: Reagents for the Removal of Transition Metals from Organic Reaction Media
Gallagher, W.
Vol. 19 , pp. 1369-1373
239 views DOI
2009
usa between the greatest economic crisis and current economic crisis
;Adina Liana Camarda;Doru Plesea
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 129-138
204 views Abstract
View All 48 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.