acta crystallographica section d, biological crystallography | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7853 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

acta crystallographica section d, biological crystallography

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name acta crystallogr d biol crystallogr
Abbreviated Name acta crystallogr d biol crystallogr
ISSN 0907-4449
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1399-0047
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2015
Structures of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3C-like protease reveal insights into substrate specificity.
Needle, Danielle;Lountos, George T;Waugh, David S;
Vol. 71 , No. Pt 5 , pp. 1102-11
334 views DOI Abstract
2004
Crystalization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of the laminarinase endo-beta-1,3-glucanase from Pyrococcus furiosus.
Ilari, Andrea;Angelaccio, Sebastiana;Fiorillo, Annarita;Florio, Rita;Consalvi, Valerio;Chiaraluce, Roberta;
Vol. 60 , No. Pt 12 Pt 2 , pp. 2394-5
298 views Abstract
2015
Structure of a highly acidic β-lactamase from the moderate halophile Chromohalobacter sp. 560 and the discovery of a Cs(+)-selective binding site.
Arai, Shigeki;Yonezawa, Yasushi;Okazaki, Nobuo;Matsumoto, Fumiko;Shibazaki, Chie;Shimizu, Rumi;Yamada, Mitsugu;Adachi, Motoyasu;Tamada, Taro;Kawamoto, Masahide;Tokunaga, Hiroko;Ishibashi, Matsujiro;Blaber, Michael;Tokunaga, Masao;Kuroki, Ryota;
Vol. 71 , No. Pt 3 , pp. 541-54
223 views DOI Abstract
2011
diseño de un sistema de adquisición de datos para variables meteorológicas
;Héctor Trujillo Alvarado;Ailyn Gutierrez Ferrera
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 1-7
222 views DOI Abstract
2003
The phase problem.
Taylor, Garry;
Vol. 59 , No. Pt 11 , pp. 1881-90
220 views Abstract
2012
regulación de la temperatura del vapor sobrecalentado en un generador de vapor bkz-340-140-29m de 100 mw mediante un control pid 2-gdl y filtraje de la medida
;Tania García Martínez;R. F. Tanda Martínez;Alberto Aguado Behar
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 70-84
199 views DOI Abstract
2013
análisis óptico y digital de la interfaseobjetivo-portamuestrautilizando imágenes obtenidas con microscopio confocal
;Myriam Herrera Paloma;Jesús Daza Figueredo;Alfredo Moreno Yeras
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 1-12
192 views DOI Abstract
2011
balance de cargas en circuitos secundarios de distribución
;Raimundo Cláudio Souza Gomes;Roberto Luis Ballesteros Horta
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 21-34
190 views DOI Abstract
2010
sistema de pesquisaje auditivo con peaee sobre pda
;María del Carmen Hernández Cordero;María Cecilia Pérez Abalo;Elsa Santos Febles
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 43-48
159 views DOI Abstract
2010
aproximaciones simbólicas en un proceso industrial de galvanizado
;Francisco Martínez de Pisón;Mayra Herrera;Beatriz Nava;Pablo Guillén
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 1-13
147 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.