Indexed in Journament

heterocycles

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,779 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
170 Articles
Scores higher than 12.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name heterocycles
Abbreviated Name heterocycles
URL https://www.heterocycles.jp

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for heterocycles
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 54.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (170)

2014
teaching elliptical excision skills to novice medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing low- and high-fidelity bench models
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 169-175
443 views DOI Abstract
2011
dermal vasculature in psoriasis and psoriasiform dermatitis: a morphometric study
Vol. 56 , No. 6 , pp. 647-649
435 views DOI Abstract
2016
relapse after oral terbinafine therapy in dermatophytosis: a clinical and mycological study
Vol. 61 , No. 5 , pp. 529-533
427 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of national leprosy eradication program after integration into general health system in rajkot district, gujarat from 2003 to 2014
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. 57-62
360 views DOI Abstract
2014
mtor signaling cascade in psoriatic disease: double kinase mtor inhibitor a novel therapeutic target
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 67-70
347 views DOI Abstract
2014
efficacy and tolerability of topical fixed combination of nadifloxacin 1% and adapalene 0.1% in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris in indian patients: a multicenter, open-labelled, prospective study
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 385-389
341 views DOI Abstract
2017
tropical diseases on insurgence: clinician's perspective
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 468-477
338 views DOI Abstract
2015
multifaceted adult t-cell leukemia/lymphoma in india: a case series
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 103-103
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
lasers in melasma: a review with consensus recommendations by indian pigmentary expert group
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 477-482
319 views DOI Abstract
2018
assessment of heavy metal and trace element levels in patients with telogen effluvium
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 246-250
187 views DOI Abstract
2018
study of s100 immunostaining in demonstrating neural granulomas in paucibacillary leprosy
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 215-219
238 views DOI Abstract
2018
low vitamin d in psoriasis: reality or myth?
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 255-260
184 views DOI Abstract
2018
factors aggravating or precipitating acne in indian adults: a hospital-based study of 110 cases
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 328-331
110 views DOI Abstract
2017
solitary nodule on the thigh
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 111-111
87 views DOI
2017
perforating lichen planus in an adolescent boy: a rare phenomenon
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 100-101
103 views DOI
2017
lasers in melasma: a review with consensus recommendations by indian pigmentary expert group
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 477-482
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
a pilot study evaluating therapeutic response of different dosage of oral glucocorticoid in two children with familial glucocorticoid deficiency presenting with diffuse mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 191-194
204 views DOI Abstract
2017
occult hepatitis b virus infections (often with human herpesvirus 7 co-infection) detected in pityriasis rosea patients: a pilot study
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 490-497
252 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,779 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

54.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.