Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3605 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom
Abbreviated Name rapid commun mass spectrom
ISSN 1097-0231
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0231
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (106 total)

2020
QUANTUM CHEMICAL MASS SPECTROMETRY: AB INITIO STUDY OF b -ION FORMATION MECHANISMS FOR THE SINGLY PROTONATED GLN-HIS-SER TRIPEPTIDE.
Cautereels, Julie;Giribaldi, Julien;Enjalbal, Christine;Blockhuys, Frank;
, pp. e8778
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of new interferences leached from plastic microcentrifuge tubes in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Chai, Yunfeng;Chen, Hongping;Gao, Guanwei;Liu, Xin;Lu, Chengyin;
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. 969-977
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of preservation methodology on stable isotope compositions of sea stars.
Le Bourg, Baptiste;Lepoint, Gilles;Michel, Loïc N;
338 views DOI Abstract
2013
Capabilities and limitations of direct analysis in real time orbitrap mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of synthetic and natural polymers.
Bridoux, Maxime C;Machuron-Mandard, Xavier;
Vol. 27 , No. 18 , pp. 2057-70
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Peptidyl-Lys metalloendopeptidase (Lys-N) purified from dry fruit of Grifola frondosa demonstrates "mirror" digestion property with lysyl endopeptidase (Lys-C).
Zhao, Mingzhi;Hao, Bingbing;Li, Honghao;Cai, Man;Xie, Jingjing;Liu, Hongyu;Tan, Minjia;Zhai, Linhui;Yu, Qun;
330 views DOI Abstract
2012
On the polymerization of hexavalent uranium. An electrospray mass spectrometry study.
Steppert, M;Walther, C;Fuss, M;Büchner, S;
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 583-91
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chemical compositional analysis of soil fulvic acids using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.
Ikeya, Kosuke;Sleighter, Rachel L;Hatcher, Patrick G;Watanabe, Akira;
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Native Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry (IM-MS) reveals that small organic acid fragments impart gas-phase stability to carbonic anhydrase II.
Veale, Clinton G L;Mateos Jimenez, Maria;Mackay, C Logan;Clarke, David J;
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of Oxygen Plasma Ashing treatment on Carbonate Clumped Isotopes.
Adlan, Qi;Davies, Amelia J;John, Cédric M;
, pp. e8802
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Geographical traceability of Chinese green tea using stable isotope and multi-element chemometrics.
Liu, Zhi;Yuan, Yuwei;Zhang, Yongzhi;Shi, Yuanzhi;Hu, Guixian;Zhu, Jiahong;Rogers, Karyne M;
Vol. 33 , No. 8 , pp. 778-788
306 views DOI Abstract
View All 106 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.