Applied and environmental microbiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1988 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Applied and environmental microbiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Appl Environ Microbiol
Abbreviated Name appl environ microbiol
ISSN 1098-5336
Aim and Scope
URL http://aem.asm.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (150 total)

1995
Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in fecal samples
Langendijk PS;Schut F;Jansen GJ;Raangs GC;Kamphuis GR;Wilkinson MH;Welling GW;;
Vol. 61 , No. 8 , pp. -
712 views Abstract
2004
Characterization of bacterial communities in feces from healthy elderly volunteers and hospitalized elderly patients by using real-time PCR and effects of antibiotic treatment on the fecal microbiota
Bartosch S;Fite A;Macfarlane GT;McMurdo ME;;
Vol. 70 , No. 6 , pp. -
620 views Abstract
2015
role of trabecular bone in visibility of laminadura: a cross-sectional radiographic study
;T Rajesh Singh;Sanjeev Jindal;Anshu Singla;A R Vinod Kumar;Ajit Damera
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 280-283
602 views DOI Abstract
2000
Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes
Bernhard AE;Field KG;;
Vol. 66 , No. 4 , pp. -
565 views Abstract
1999
Distribution of bifidobacterial species in human intestinal microflora examined with 16S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers
Matsuki T;Watanabe K;Tanaka R;Fukuda M;Oyaizu H;;
Vol. 65 , No. 10 , pp. -
547 views Abstract
2012
role of dental pulp in identification of the deceased individual by establishing abo blood grouping and rhesus factor
;Nalini Aswath;S C Selvamuthukumar;B Karthika
Vol. 23 , No. 6 , pp. 811-813
504 views DOI Abstract
2015
effects of clinical use and sterilization on surface topography and surface roughness of three commonly used types of orthodontic archwires
;Joji Isac;B S Chandrashekar;S Mahendra;C M Mahesh;Bala Mohan Shetty;A V Arun
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 378-383
495 views DOI Abstract
1980
Proficiency test sample media for single and mixed pure cultures of water pollution indicator bacteria.
Toombs, R W;Connor, D A;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 883-7
455 views Abstract
2012
status of dental health in chemical warfare victims: the case of isfahan, iran
;Ahmad Mottaghi;Abolfath Hoseinzade;Elham Zamani;Habib Allah Araghizade
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 506-508
451 views DOI Abstract
2001
Specific identification and targeted characterization of Bifidobacterium lactis from different environmental isolates by a combined multiplex-PCR approach
Ventura M;Reniero R;Zink R;;
Vol. 67 , No. 6 , pp. -
439 views Abstract
View All 150 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.