proceedings of 2019 16th international bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, ibcast 2019 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8765 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

proceedings of 2019 16th international bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, ibcast 2019

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of 2019 16th international bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, ibcast 2019
Abbreviated Name proceedings of 2019 16th international bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology, ibcast 2019
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.ibcast.org.pk
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2008
microbiological quality for bathing water in the "conde del guadalhorce" reservoir of málaga city, spain, 2000-2005 calidad microbiológica de las aguas de baño del embalse conde de guadalhorce, de málaga (españa), 2000-2005
;Joaquín Jesús Gámez de la Hoz;Ana Padilla Fortes
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-27
360 views Abstract
2019
Improving test adequacy assessment by novel JavaScript mutation operators
Muzamal, M.
, pp. 647-652
271 views DOI
2011
research as an innovative tool in the field of environmental health la investigación como instrumento innovador de la sanidad ambiental
;Volney de Magalhães Cãmara;Leiliane Coelho André Amorim;Luiz Augusto Cassanha Galvão
Vol. 11 , No. 1-2 , pp. 1-8
239 views Abstract
2013
children’s environmental health salud ambiental de los niños saúde ambiental das crianças
;Raquel Rodrigues dos Santos;Rogério Nunes
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 3-4
214 views
2006
conclusiones y recomendaciones conclusions and recommendations
;María Saquero Martínez;María Elisa Gómez Campoy;José María Ordóñez Iriarte
Vol. 6 , No. 1-2 , pp. 92-94
189 views Abstract
2005
de ciudades saludables a ciudades sostenibles: la experiencia de castilla-la mancha en la agenda local 21 from healthy cities to sustainable cities: the castilla-la mancha experience in local agenda 21
;Francisco Javier Santamarta Álvarez
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 118-125
179 views Abstract
2013
bisfenol-a: un ejemplo paradigmático en alteración endocrina
;Mariana F. Fernández
Vol. 13 , pp. 64-66
145 views
2013
legionelosis esporádica: un problema sin resolver sporadic legionellosis: an unsolved problem egionelose esporádica: um problema não resolvido
;Mikel Etxeberria Agirresarobe;Yolanda Cuetos;Mónica Otazua Font;Loreto Santa Marina Rodriguez;Ana Maria Jiménez Zabala;Koldo de la Fuente Campos
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 73-79
143 views Abstract
2013
criterios para la evaluación sanitaria de proyectos de reutilización de aguas depuradas. evaluación de riesgos
;Manuel Herrera Artiles
Vol. 13 , pp. 34-37
135 views
2013
evaluación del riesgo de inundación: impactos directos e indirectos en humanos
;Nuria Osés Eraso
Vol. 13 , pp. 20-22
117 views
View All 12 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.