software - practice and experience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1837 / 33,951
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

software - practice and experience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name software - practice and experience
Abbreviated Name software - practice and experience
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (124 total)

2018
optimization of aqueous enzymatic extraction of oil from shrimp processing by-products using response surface methodology
;Chen WENWEI;Huang GUANGRONG;Jia ZHENBAO;Hong YAO
, pp. -
396 views DOI Abstract
characterization and evaluation of sensory acceptability of ice creams incorporated with beta-carotene encapsulated in solid lipid microparticles
;Juliana Gobbi de LIMA;Thais Carvalho BRITO-OLIVEIRA;Samantha Cristina de PINHO
, pp. -
383 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of ultrasound treatment on quality and microbial load of carrot juice
;Yu ZOU;Aili JIANG
, pp. -
366 views DOI Abstract
effects of ractopamine hydrochloride and immunological castration in pigs. part 2: belly quality characteristics and fatty acid composition
;Letícia Cristina COSTA E SILVA;Roger Darros BARBOSA;Expedito Tadeu Facco SILVEIRA
, pp. -
364 views DOI Abstract
2010
design of automatic control system for the precipitation of bromelain from the extract of pineapple wastes
;Flavio Vasconcelos da Silva;Regina Lúcia de Andrade dos Santos;Tatiana Lie Fujiki;Manuela Souza Leite;Ana Maria Frattini Fileti
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 1033-1040
347 views DOI Abstract
2008
effect of osmotic predehydration on drying characteristics of banana fruits efeito da pré-secagem osmótica sobre as características de banana desidratada
;Vahideh Ranemaye Rabbani Jalali;Narendra Narain;Gabriel Francisco da Silva
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 269-273
316 views DOI Abstract
2005
níveis de mercúrio total em peixes de água doce de pisciculturas paulistas mercury levels in freshwater fishes from piscicultures estabilished in são paulo state
;Marcelo A. Morgano;Priscila C. Gomes;Dilza M. B. Mantovani;Adriana A. M. Perrone;Talita F. Santos
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 250-253
314 views DOI Abstract
2012
effect of addition of different hydrocolloids on pasting, thermal, and rheological properties of cassava starch
;Tatiana Dias Leite;Joel Fernando Nicoleti;Ana Lúcia Barretto Penna;Célia Maria Landi Franco
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 579-587
311 views Abstract
2003
pós-colheita de pêssegos (prunus pérsica l. bastsch) revestidos com filmes a base de amido como alternativa à cera comercial postharvest of peaches (prunus persica l. bastsch) covered with film-forming of cassava starch as alternative to the commercial wax
;Marcelo Alvares de Oliveira;Marney Pascoli Cereda
Vol. 23 , pp. 28-33
309 views DOI Abstract
2010
determinação de aflatoxina b1 em rações e aflatoxina m1 no leite de propriedades do estado de são paulo determination of aflatoxin b1 in animal feed and aflatoxin m1 in milk in dairy farms of são paulo state
;Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira;Luciana Soares Sebastião;Helena Fagundes;Roice Eliana Rosim;Andrezza Maria Fernandes
Vol. 30 , pp. 221-225
306 views DOI Abstract
View All 124 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.