proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1841 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (101 total)

2008
advance of second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
;Li ZHANG
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 4-9
730 views Abstract
2009
distribution and mrna expression of bambi in non-small-cell lung cancer
;Shen MIAO;Lei ZHAO;Jian GAO;Hui WANG;Zeshi CUI
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 203-207
397 views Abstract
2011
expressions of c-cbl, cbl-b and egfr and its role of prognosis in nsclc
;Xin JIAO;Bo JIN;Xiujuan QU;Shunchao YAN;Kezuo HOU;Yunpeng LIU;Xuejun HU
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 512-517
389 views DOI Abstract
2010
effect of bufalin on proliferation and apoptosis of human non-small cell lung cancer a549 cell
;Zhitu ZHU;Yunlong YU;Kai WANG;Enze LI;Yangyang LIU;Yunpeng LIU
Vol. 13 , No. 9 , pp. 841-845
385 views Abstract
2011
clinical significance of detection of serum values of neuron specific enolase 
before and after treatment for small cell lung cancer
;Feng XUE;Liyan WANG;Mingyan ZHANG;Li CAI
Vol. 14 , No. 9 , pp. 723-726
381 views DOI Abstract
2016
mechanism of trim24 to regulate resistance of gefitinib in nsclc cells
;Haiying LI;Qingling WANG;Haijun BAO;Heng ZHANG;Ying ZHUANG
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 24-29
355 views DOI Abstract
2010
the comparative study of lymph node dissection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) and conventional lateral incision surgery
;Qiang LI;Jintao HE;Xiang ZHUANG;Xiaojun YANG;Jiang ZHU;Tianpeng XIE;Ping XIAO;Xiang WANG;Hao RONG
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 1141-1144
354 views Abstract
2010
expression of carbonic anhydrase ix in nsclc and its relationship with vegf and ki67 expression
;Xiangfei ZHAO;Xiaoqing LIU;Wanfeng GUO;Xiaobing LI
Vol. 13 , No. 9 , pp. 861-866
345 views Abstract
2013
relationship between bim gene polymorphism and therapeutic efficacy in the 
retreatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitor
;Lei ZHENG;Baochai LIN;Zhengbo SONG;Fangjun XIE;Wei HONG;Jianguo FENG;Lan SHAO;Yingping ZHANG
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 632-638
337 views DOI Abstract
2009
antiangiogenic effect of oyster polypeptide (opp)
;Zhenhua WANG;Jincheng LIU;Ai SU;Mi SUN;Chunbo WANG
Vol. 12 , No. 8 , pp. 841-848
319 views Abstract
View All 101 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.