Indexed in Journament

proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,565 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
101 Articles
Scores higher than 29.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 69.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for proceedings of the 10th acm multimedia systems conference, mmsys 2019
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 0.0 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 2.9 5.8
Content Distribution 69.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (101)

2008
advance of second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 4-9
790 views Abstract
2011
clinical significance of detection of serum values of neuron specific enolase 
before and after treatment for small cell lung cancer
Vol. 14 , No. 9 , pp. 723-726
454 views DOI Abstract
2011
expressions of c-cbl, cbl-b and egfr and its role of prognosis in nsclc
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 512-517
437 views DOI Abstract
2009
distribution and mrna expression of bambi in non-small-cell lung cancer
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 203-207
431 views Abstract
2016
mechanism of trim24 to regulate resistance of gefitinib in nsclc cells
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 24-29
417 views DOI Abstract
2010
effect of bufalin on proliferation and apoptosis of human non-small cell lung cancer a549 cell
Vol. 13 , No. 9 , pp. 841-845
416 views Abstract
2010
the comparative study of lymph node dissection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) and conventional lateral incision surgery
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 1141-1144
411 views Abstract
2010
expression of carbonic anhydrase ix in nsclc and its relationship with vegf and ki67 expression
Vol. 13 , No. 9 , pp. 861-866
395 views Abstract
2013
relationship between bim gene polymorphism and therapeutic efficacy in the 
retreatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Vol. 16 , No. 12 , pp. 632-638
381 views DOI Abstract
2015
mechanism of c-met in non-small cell lung cancer and its treatment and testing
Vol. 18 , No. 12 , pp. page-page
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
surgical treatment of lung cancer combined with interstitial lung disease
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. 343-350
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of lung adenosquamous carcinoma 
in seer database between 2010 and 2015
Vol. 21 , No. 8 , pp. 600-609
341 views DOI Abstract
2018
could surgery play a role in stage iva lung cancer with intrapleural dissemination?
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 311-312
200 views DOI
2018
characteristics of ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension patients 
with different shape of interventricular septum:
preliminary study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 397-402
272 views DOI Abstract
2018
preface
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 251-251
125 views DOI
Journament Score
29.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,565 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.