softwarex | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1230 / 33,931
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

softwarex

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name softwarex
Abbreviated Name softwarex
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2015
ezrin: a regulator of actin microfilaments in cell junctions of the rat testis
;N Ece Gungor-Ordueri;Ciler Celik-Ozenci;C Yan Cheng
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 653-658
570 views DOI Abstract
2014
differential expression of 5-alpha reductase isozymes in the prostate and its clinical implications
;Kai Wang;Dong-Dong Fan;Song Jin;Nian-Zeng Xing;Yi-Nong Niu
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 274-279
304 views DOI Abstract
2014
pi3k-akt-mtor signaling in prostate cancer progression and androgen deprivation therapy resistance
;Merritt P Edlind;Andrew C Hsieh
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 378-386
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
jDSSAT: A JavaScript Module for DSSAT-CSM integration
de, Abreu Resenes J.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
260 views DOI
2014
persistent organic pollutants and male reproductive health
;Anne Vested;Aleksander Giwercman;Jens Peter Bonde;Gunnar Toft
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 71-80
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
dietary n-6:n-3 ratio and vitamin e improve motility characteristics in association with membrane properties of boar spermatozoa
;Qing Liu;Yuan-Fei Zhou;Run-Jia Duan;Hong-Kui Wei;Jian Peng;Si-Wen Jiang
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 223-229
244 views DOI Abstract
2014
androgens and estrogens in skeletal sexual dimorphism
;Michaël Laurent;Leen Antonio;Mieke Sinnesael; Vanessa Dubois;Evelien Gielen;Frank Classens;Dirk Vanderschueren
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 213-222
233 views DOI Abstract
2014
long noncoding rna-mediated activation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer
;Gyorgy Petrovics;Shiv Srivastava
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 418-419
226 views DOI Abstract
2014
scientific publications in andrology journals from chinese authors in various parts of east asia: a 10-year survey of the literature
;Wei Zhang;Teng-Yun Wu;Chuan-Liang Xu;Chun-Lei Jiang;Tie Zhou;Ying-Hao Sun
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 934-936
218 views DOI
2015
estrogen receptor (α and β) but not androgen receptor expression is correlated with recurrence, progression and survival in post prostatectomy t3n0m0 locally advanced prostate cancer in an urban greek population
;Georgios Megas; Michael Chrisofos; Ioannis Anastasiou; Aida Tsitlidou; Theodosia Choreftaki; Charalampos Deliveliotis
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 98-105
215 views Abstract
View All 38 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.