revista cubana de ciencias informáticas | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2147 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

revista cubana de ciencias informáticas

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
Abbreviated Name revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (230 total)

2013
efeitos da atorvastatina e do polimorfismo t-786c do gene enos sobre parâmetros do metabolismo lipídico plasmático effects of atorvastatin and t-786c polymorphism of enos gene on plasma metabolic lipid parameters
Vol. 100 , No. 1 , pp. 14-20
543 views Abstract
2010
prevalência de fatores de risco cardiovascular em idosos usuários do sistema Único de saúde de goiânia prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in elderly individuals treated in the brazilian public health system in goiânia
Vol. 95 , No. 5 , pp. 621-628
518 views Abstract
2007
perfil do tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca na era dos betabloqueadores heart failure treatment profile at the beta blockers era
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 475-479
491 views DOI Abstract
2012
efeito do levosimendan em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca sistólica severa e agravamento da função renal effect of levosimendan in patients with severe systolic heart failure and worsening renal function
Vol. 98 , No. 6 , pp. 537-543
475 views Abstract
2017
functional capacity in congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
, pp. -
458 views DOI Abstract
1999
myocardial repair with long-term and low-dose administration of a nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor. myofibroblasts, type iii collagen and fibronectin
Vol. 73 , No. 1 , pp. 92-96
432 views DOI Abstract
2010
estudo comparativo do perfil pró-aterosclerótico de estudantes de medicina e de educação física estudio comparativo del perfil pro-aterosclerótico de estudiantes de medicina y de educación física comparative study of the pro-atherosclerotic profile of students of medicine and physical education
Vol. 95 , No. 1 , pp. 21-29
410 views Abstract
2014
GeReport: Sistema de Gestión de Reportes Dinámicos
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 116-129
406 views Abstract
2010
preditores clínicos de fração de ejeção preservada em insuficiência cardíaca descompensada clinical predictors of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in decompensated heart failure
Vol. 94 , No. 3 , pp. 385-393
395 views DOI Abstract
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.