Indexed in Journament

revista cubana de ciencias informáticas

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,120 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
230 Articles
Scores higher than 58.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
Abbreviated Name revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 56.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.9
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 56.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (230)

2013
efeitos da atorvastatina e do polimorfismo t-786c do gene enos sobre parâmetros do metabolismo lipídico plasmático effects of atorvastatin and t-786c polymorphism of enos gene on plasma metabolic lipid parameters
Vol. 100 , No. 1 , pp. 14-20
615 views Abstract
2010
prevalência de fatores de risco cardiovascular em idosos usuários do sistema Único de saúde de goiânia prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in elderly individuals treated in the brazilian public health system in goiânia
Vol. 95 , No. 5 , pp. 621-628
554 views Abstract
2012
efeito do levosimendan em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca sistólica severa e agravamento da função renal effect of levosimendan in patients with severe systolic heart failure and worsening renal function
Vol. 98 , No. 6 , pp. 537-543
537 views Abstract
2007
perfil do tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca na era dos betabloqueadores heart failure treatment profile at the beta blockers era
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 475-479
537 views DOI Abstract
2017
functional capacity in congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
, pp. -
505 views DOI Abstract
1999
myocardial repair with long-term and low-dose administration of a nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor. myofibroblasts, type iii collagen and fibronectin
Vol. 73 , No. 1 , pp. 92-96
474 views DOI Abstract
2010
estudo comparativo do perfil pró-aterosclerótico de estudantes de medicina e de educação física estudio comparativo del perfil pro-aterosclerótico de estudiantes de medicina y de educación física comparative study of the pro-atherosclerotic profile of students of medicine and physical education
Vol. 95 , No. 1 , pp. 21-29
466 views Abstract
2014
GeReport: Sistema de Gestión de Reportes Dinámicos
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 116-129
451 views Abstract
2010
preditores clínicos de fração de ejeção preservada em insuficiência cardíaca descompensada clinical predictors of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in decompensated heart failure
Vol. 94 , No. 3 , pp. 385-393
439 views DOI Abstract
2017
twenty-four hour blood pressure in obese patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea
, pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
functional capacity in congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
, pp. -
505 views DOI Abstract
2016
paradigm-hf: a paradigm shift in heart failure treatment?
Vol. 106 , No. 1 , pp. 77-79
181 views DOI
2016
case 2/2016 - scimitar sign with right pulmonary vein drainage into the right atrium
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. 153-155
168 views DOI
2016
brazilian cardiorespiratory fitness classification based on maximum oxygen consumption
Vol. 106 , No. 5 , pp. 389-395
334 views DOI Abstract
2016
middle aortic syndrome treated by implantation of an advanta v12 large diameter stent
Vol. 106 , No. 1 , pp. 73-75
240 views DOI
2015
acute coronary syndrome treatment costs from the perspective of the supplementary health system
Vol. 105 , No. 4 , pp. 339-344
108 views DOI Abstract
2015
the representativeness of the arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia for brazilian cardiology science
Vol. 104 , No. 2 , pp. 94-96
178 views DOI
2015
echocardiographic predictors of worse outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy
, pp. 0-0
137 views DOI Abstract
2015
isolated anterior mitral valve leaflet cleft: 3d transthoracic echocardiography-guided surgical strategy
Vol. 104 , No. 5 , pp. e49-e52
198 views DOI
Journament Score
34.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,120 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.