ieee internet computing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3303 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 3 semanas

ieee internet computing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
ulakbim sci
Nome Abreviado ieee internet computing
Nome Abreviado ieee internet computing
ISSN 1089-7801
Objetivo e Escopo
URL http://www.computer.org/internet
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (68 total)

1997
Collaborative work: The apache http server project
Fielding, R.
Vol. 1 , pp. 88-90
264 views DOI
2003
para mi amigo fernando garcía desde el perú
;Armando Sánchez Málaga
Vol. 57 , No. 200 , pp. 86-86
233 views
2016
nayive ananías gómez. si aquí tu genio y talento no da fama. análisis de la trayectoria de los prisioneros entre 1984 y 1990 desde una perspectiva musicológica interdisciplinaria.
;Nayive Ananías Gómez
Vol. 70 , No. 225 , pp. 138-138
212 views
2011
cañutos y soplidos tiempo y cultura en las zampoñas de las sociedades precolombinas de arica time and culture in panpipes of the precolumbian societies in arica, chile
;Juan Chacama Rodríguez;Alberto Díaz Araya
Vol. 65 , No. 216 , pp. 34-57
181 views Abstract
2004
dualidad. chilean music for solo cello. cd. intérpretes: pablo mahave-veglia y otros. eroica, jdt 3194. ee.uu., 2004
;Gabriel Matthey Correa
Vol. 58 , No. 202 , pp. 92-94
175 views
2014
luis merino, rodrigo torres, cristián guerra y guillermo marchant. prácticas sociales de la música en chile, 1810-1855. el advenimiento de la modernidad en la cultura del país. santiago: ril editores, 2013, 233 pp.
;Fernando García Arancibia
Vol. 68 , No. 221 , pp. 98-101
174 views
2007
victoria ocampo y la música: una experiencia social y estética de la modernidad victoria ocampo and music: a social and aesthetic experience of modernism
;Omar Corrado
Vol. 61 , No. 208 , pp. 37-65
174 views Abstract
2001
el canto coral en el sur de chile
;Ernesto Guarda
Vol. 55 , No. 195 , pp. 69-70
173 views
2013
maría pilar peña queralt y juan carlos poveda viera. alfonso leng. música, modernidad y chilenidad a principios del siglo xx. santiago: autoedición con financiamiento del fondo de fomento de la música nacional, 2010, 211 pp.
;Nicolás Masquiarán Díaz
Vol. 67 , No. 219 , pp. 101-102
169 views
2016
fátima graciela musri. música y radiodifusión en san juan (argentina). aproximación a la historia local de la música entre 1930 y 1944.
;Fátima Graciela Graciela Musri
Vol. 70 , No. 225 , pp. 136-137
164 views
View All 68 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.