Indexed in Journament

international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,207 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
99 Articles
Scores higher than 48.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives
Abbreviated Name international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives
URL https://www.isprs.org/publications/archives.aspx

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 51.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 51.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (99)

1973
chromosomes of south american bufonidae (amphibia, anura) chromosomes of south american bufonidae (amphibia, anura)
;Brum Zorrilla N.;Saenz F. A.
Vol. 11 , No. 52 , pp. 51-61
349 views Abstract
2014
Development and comparison of Open Source based web GIS frameworks on WAMP and Apache Tomcat web servers
Agrawal, S.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1-5
296 views DOI
1993
presentación
;Caldasia Revista
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. -
294 views Abstract
1966
contribuciones al conocimiento de la morfología comparada de las inflohescencias y de las formas de crecimiento de las melastomataceae: 1. inflorescencias de huilaea, topobea y blakea
;Mora Osejo Luis Eduardo
Vol. 9 , No. 44 , pp. 303-312
285 views Abstract
1982
dos nuevas especies de hyla (amphibia: anura) de colombia, con aportes al conocimiento de hyla bogotensis dos nuevas especies de hyla (amphibia: anura) de colombia, con aportes al conocimiento de hyla bogotensis
;Ruiz C. Pedro M.;Lynch John D.
Vol. 13 , No. 64 , pp. 647-671
275 views Abstract
2018
An interferometric processing method to maintain both accuracy and resolution of dem using GAOFEN-3 SAR data
Li, T.
Vol. 42 , pp. 937-941
256 views DOI
2014
ontogeny of the diet in anurans (amphibia) collected at la vieja river basin in the deparmento of quindio (colombia)
;SERGIO ENRIQUE MORENO-BARBOSA;JULIO MARIO HOYOS-HOYOS
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 365-372
249 views DOI Abstract
2016
composiciÓn florÍstica y estructura de los bosques ribereÑos de la cuenca baja del rÍo pauto, casanare, colombia
;Diego Mauricio Cabrera-Amaya;Orlando Rivera-Díaz
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 53-85
231 views DOI Abstract
2007
reptiles de Áreas asociadas a humedales de la planicie del departamento de cÓrdoba, colombia
;CARVAJAL-COGOLLO JUAN E.;CASTAÑO-MORA OLGA V.;CÁRDENAS-ARÉVALO GLADYS;URBINA-CARDONA JOSÉ NICOLÁS
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 427-438
231 views Abstract
2015
Comparison of two satellite imaging platforms for evaluating sand dune migration in the Ubari Sand Sea (Libyan Fazzan)
Els, A.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1375-1380
230 views DOI
2022
GEO COLLECTOR BOT: A TELEGRAM-BASED OPEN TOOLKIT TO SUPPORT FIELD DATA COLLECTION
Oxoli, D.
Vol. 48 , pp. 351-356
120 views DOI
2019
VIRTUAL MUSEUMS – The FUTURE of HISTORICAL MONUMENTS DOCUMENTATION and VISUALIZATION
Pavelka, K.
Vol. 42 , pp. 903-908
190 views DOI
2019
Can geoinformation help to better protect informal settlements?-a concept for the city of medellin
Dorner, W.
Vol. 42 , pp. 115-120
216 views DOI
2019
A new thinking of lulc classification accuracy assessment
Cheng, K.
Vol. 42 , pp. 1207-1211
185 views DOI
2019
Classification accuracy assessment for regional vector data product based on spatial sampling: A case study of Japan
Lu, Y.
Vol. 42 , pp. 1243-1247
162 views DOI
2018
An interferometric processing method to maintain both accuracy and resolution of dem using GAOFEN-3 SAR data
Li, T.
Vol. 42 , pp. 937-941
256 views DOI
2018
Preliminary Gaofen-3 InSAR DEM accuracy analysis
Chen, Q.
Vol. 42 , pp. 173-177
209 views DOI
2016
composiciÓn florÍstica y estructura de los bosques ribereÑos de la cuenca baja del rÍo pauto, casanare, colombia
;Diego Mauricio Cabrera-Amaya;Orlando Rivera-Díaz
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 53-85
231 views DOI Abstract
2016
la mejor escuela
;Brigitte Baptiste
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. -
191 views Abstract
2016
efectos de la conectividad local sobre los ensambles de peces en una planicie de inundación tropical
;Ángela L. Gutiérrez-C.;Gabriel A. Pinilla-A.
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 300-313
24 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,207 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

51.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.