international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6788 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives
Abbreviated Name international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - isprs archives
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.isprs.org/publications/archives.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (99 total)

1973
chromosomes of south american bufonidae (amphibia, anura) chromosomes of south american bufonidae (amphibia, anura)
;Brum Zorrilla N.;Saenz F. A.
Vol. 11 , No. 52 , pp. 51-61
303 views Abstract
2014
Development and comparison of Open Source based web GIS frameworks on WAMP and Apache Tomcat web servers
Agrawal, S.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1-5
273 views DOI
1993
presentación
;Caldasia Revista
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. -
266 views Abstract
1966
contribuciones al conocimiento de la morfología comparada de las inflohescencias y de las formas de crecimiento de las melastomataceae: 1. inflorescencias de huilaea, topobea y blakea
;Mora Osejo Luis Eduardo
Vol. 9 , No. 44 , pp. 303-312
256 views Abstract
2018
An interferometric processing method to maintain both accuracy and resolution of dem using GAOFEN-3 SAR data
Li, T.
Vol. 42 , pp. 937-941
241 views DOI
1982
dos nuevas especies de hyla (amphibia: anura) de colombia, con aportes al conocimiento de hyla bogotensis dos nuevas especies de hyla (amphibia: anura) de colombia, con aportes al conocimiento de hyla bogotensis
;Ruiz C. Pedro M.;Lynch John D.
Vol. 13 , No. 64 , pp. 647-671
238 views Abstract
2014
ontogeny of the diet in anurans (amphibia) collected at la vieja river basin in the deparmento of quindio (colombia)
;SERGIO ENRIQUE MORENO-BARBOSA;JULIO MARIO HOYOS-HOYOS
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 365-372
231 views DOI Abstract
2015
Comparison of two satellite imaging platforms for evaluating sand dune migration in the Ubari Sand Sea (Libyan Fazzan)
Els, A.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1375-1380
213 views DOI
2007
reptiles de Áreas asociadas a humedales de la planicie del departamento de cÓrdoba, colombia
;CARVAJAL-COGOLLO JUAN E.;CASTAÑO-MORA OLGA V.;CÁRDENAS-ARÉVALO GLADYS;URBINA-CARDONA JOSÉ NICOLÁS
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 427-438
203 views Abstract
2019
Can geoinformation help to better protect informal settlements?-a concept for the city of medellin
Dorner, W.
Vol. 42 , pp. 115-120
198 views DOI
View All 99 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.