american journal of physiology renal physiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2269 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

american journal of physiology renal physiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name am j physiol renal physiol
Abbreviated Name am j physiol renal physiol
ISSN 1522-1466
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (125 total)

2007
apports relatifs en nourritures naturelle et artificielle dans l’alimentation du tilapia oreochromis niloticus en captivite
;BAMBA Y.;OUATTARA A.;MOREAU J.;GOURENE G.
, No. 386 , pp. 55-68
361 views DOI Abstract
1937
l'aménagement halieutique des eaux courantes
;DE BOUVILLE M. DE DROUIN
, No. 103 , pp. 176-182
345 views DOI
2005
keynote address: conservation genetics of freshwater organisms
;WEISS S.
, No. 376-377 , pp. 571-583
340 views DOI Abstract
2001
seaward drift of the pontic shad larvae (alosa pontica) and the influence of danube river hydrology on their travel path through the danube delta system.
;NAVODARU I.
, No. 362-363 , pp. 749-760
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Trehalose attenuates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by enhancing autophagy and inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation.
Liu, Suwen;Yang, Yunwen;Gao, Huiping;Zhou, Ning;Wang, Peipei;Zhang, Yue;Zhang, Aihua;Jia, Zhanjun;Huang, Songming;
312 views DOI Abstract
2018
Protective effect of the BET protein inhibitor JQ1 in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.
Sun, Liping;Liu, Jing;Yuan, Yanggang;Zhang, Xinzhou;Dong, Zheng;
Vol. 315 , No. 3 , pp. F469-F478
308 views DOI Abstract
2004
la pÊche au saumon dans le massif armoricain : État des lieux et mesure de l’effort de pÊche1
;SALANIÉ J.;LE GOFFE P.;SURRY Y.
, No. 375 , pp. 35-70
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
p53-cyclophilin D mediates renal tubular cell apoptosis in ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury
Yang, H.
Vol. 317 , pp. F1311-F1317
301 views DOI
1992
revue bibliographique - principales caractéristiques de l'élevage de l'omble chevalier (salvelinus alpinus l.) en eau douce
;GUILLARD J.;GILLET C.;CHAMPIGNEULLE A.
, No. 325 , pp. 47-68
298 views DOI Abstract
2011
two indigenous european crayfish under threat – how can we retain them in aquatic ecosystems for the future?
;Peay S.;Füreder L.
, No. 401 , pp. 33-
293 views DOI Abstract
View All 125 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.