Indexed in Journament

Journal of applied microbiology

ISSN 1365-2672· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #349 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
186 Articles
Scores higher than 98.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Appl Microbiol
Abbreviated Name j appl microbiol
ISSN 1365-2672
URL https://academic.oup.com/jambio

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of applied microbiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 100.0 5.8
Diversity 61.1 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 23.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (186)

1997
Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes
Vol. 82 , No. 6 , pp. 759-762
506 views
2000
Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils
Vol. 88 , No. 2 , pp. 308-316
473 views
2019
8-Hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonamides are promising antifungal candidates for the topical treatment of dermatomycosis.
462 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diversity and abundance of comammox bacteria in the sediments of an urban lake.
461 views DOI Abstract
2009
Diversity and spatial distribution of amoA-encoding archaea in the deep-sea sediments of the tropical West Pacific Continental Margin.
Vol. 106 , No. 5 , pp. 1482-93
432 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimal fluorescent-dye staining time for the real-time detection of microbes: A study of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
414 views DOI Abstract
2026
Intra-individual genetic diversity of vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus revealed through citizen science-driven isolation and pangenome analysis
DOI Abstract
2026
Integration of Genome Mining and HiTES Reveals Secondary Metabolic Potential in Marine-Derived Aspergillus sp. WHUF0304
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Rethinking escape frequency benchmarks for environmental applications of engineered microorganisms
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Carvacrol thymol formulation: bactericidal activity without detectable early resistance induction in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Microbial dysbiosis exacerbates exercise fatigue in mice under hypobaric hypoxia
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Complementary detection of respiratory pathogens and antimicrobial-resistance markers by multiplex PCR alongside culture in a High-AMR Egyptian cohort
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Manipulation of rhizosphere microbiome by Microbacterium sp. GB16_1_BI to promote plant growth
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Constructed wetland treatment increases prevalence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates but decreases overall concentrations
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #349 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

45.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

23.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.