Indexed in Journament

journal of chemical education

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,734 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 15.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kisa Ad journal of chemical education
Kisaltilmis Ad journal of chemical education

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 36.7
Innovation 10.5
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 73.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 36.7 24.4
Innovation 10.5 25.7
Community Impact 2.1 5.8
Content Distribution 73.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2017
assessment of maxillary sinus wall thickness with paranasal sinus digital tomosynthesis and ct
;Jieun Byun;Sung Shine Shim;Yookyung Kim;Kyoung Ae Kong
Vol. 76 , No. 5 , pp. 314-321
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Student-Designed Green Chemistry Experiment for a Large-Enrollment, Introductory Organic Laboratory Course
Wu, N.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2420-2425
370 views DOI
2016
a pilomatricoma misdiagnosed as male breast cancer
;Jea Ryoung Gil;Sun Jin Herh;Yoonjung Kim;Min A Song;Mi Young Kim;Eun-Kyung Kim
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 156-159
297 views DOI Abstract
2020
Student Individuality Impacts Use and Benefits of an Online Video Library for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory
Pölloth, B.
, pp. 0-0
292 views DOI
2019
Addition to: News from the periodic table: An introduction to 'periodicity symbols, tables, and models for higher-order valency and donor-acceptor kinships' (Journal of Chemical Education (2007) 84:7 (1145-1146) DOI: 10.1021/ed084p1145)
Weinhold, F.
Vol. 96 , pp. 1051
285 views DOI
2019
Can We Compare Attitude Scores among Diverse Populations? An Exploration of Measurement Invariance Testing to Support Valid Comparisons between Black Female Students and Their Peers in an Organic Chemistry Course
Rocabado, G.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2371-2382
282 views DOI
2017
Making a Game out of It: Using Web-Based Competitive Quizzes for Quantitative Analysis Content Review
Grinias, J.
Vol. 94 , pp. 1363-1366
281 views DOI
2019
Globally Distributed Drug Discovery of New Antibiotics: Design and Combinatorial Synthesis of Amino Acid Derivatives in the Organic Chemistry Laboratory
Dounay, A.
Vol. 96 , pp. 1731-1737
276 views DOI
2019
CHEMCompete-II: An Organic Chemistry Card Game to Differentiate between Substitution and Elimination Reactions of Alcohols
Camarca, M.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2535-2539
263 views DOI
2019
Stereochemistry of Dichlorocarbene Addition to Alkenes: A Collaborative, Discovery-Based Experiment for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory
Thu, Le N.
Vol. 96 , pp. 1727-1730
254 views DOI
2020
Blockchain: Will Better Data Security Change Chemical Education?
Pence, H.E.
Vol. 97 , pp. 1815-1818
152 views DOI
2020
Implementing a Multidimensional Education Approach Combining Problem-Based Learning and Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate in a Third-Year Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Course
Hu, Y.
Vol. 97 , pp. 1874-1886
174 views DOI
2020
Student Individuality Impacts Use and Benefits of an Online Video Library for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory
Pölloth, B.
, pp. 0-0
292 views DOI
2019
Activating Students' Prior Knowledge Using a Bridge Activity as an Initial Interactive Discussion in a Flipped Organic Chemistry Course
Stewart, J.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2426-2431
183 views DOI
2019
CHEMCompete-II: An Organic Chemistry Card Game to Differentiate between Substitution and Elimination Reactions of Alcohols
Camarca, M.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2535-2539
263 views DOI
2019
Can We Compare Attitude Scores among Diverse Populations? An Exploration of Measurement Invariance Testing to Support Valid Comparisons between Black Female Students and Their Peers in an Organic Chemistry Course
Rocabado, G.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2371-2382
282 views DOI
2019
Student-Designed Green Chemistry Experiment for a Large-Enrollment, Introductory Organic Laboratory Course
Wu, N.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2420-2425
370 views DOI
2019
Connecting Organic Chemistry Concepts with Real-World Contexts by Creating Infographics
Kothari, D.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2524-2527
231 views DOI
2019
Chemistry Teacher Isolation, Contextual Characteristics, and Student Performance
Padwa, L.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2383-2392
134 views DOI
2019
You've Got Mail (and Homework): Simple Strategies for Promoting Student Engagement with Prelecture Videos
Woodward, R.
Vol. 96 , pp. 2055-2058
154 views DOI
Journament Score
27.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,734 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

36.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.