Indexed in Journament

classical bulletin

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,810 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 46% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name classical bulletin
Abbreviated Name classical bulletin

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 44.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 44.1 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2017
on a fair manifold fare rating on a long traffic line
;Stanislav PALÚCH;Tomáš MAJER
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-11
924 views DOI Abstract
2015
solar energised transport solution and customer preferences and opinions about alternative fuel vehicles – the case of slovenia
;Matjaž KNEZ;Marjan STERNAD
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 17-28
324 views Abstract
2013
electronic road toll systems in slovakia and a country selected from central europe
;Miroslav FAZEKAŠ;Marián ŠULGAN;Štefan LIŠČÁK
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 35-44
321 views Abstract
2013
the impact of procurement method of the transport services to the financial requirement of performance contracting entity
;Miloš POLIAK;Anna KRIŽANOVÁ;Štefánia SEMANOVÁ;Ľubica ŠTEFÁNIKOVÁ
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 67-75
281 views Abstract
2007
design of gps-gprs module for localization vehicles and cargo
;Piotr NOWAKOWSKI
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 37-44
277 views Abstract
2018
influence of primary silicon precipitates on anodized aluminum alloys surface layer properties
;Krzysztof LABISZ;Jarosław KONIECZNY;Łukasz WIERZBICKI;Janusz ĆWIEK;Anna BUTOR
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 111-120
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
main trends of biofuels production in ukraine
;Myroslav PANCHUK;Sviatoslav KRYSHTOPA;Liubomyr SHLAPAK;Liudmyla KRYSHTOPA;Andrii PANCHUK;Volodymyr YAROVYI;Aleksander SŁADKOWSKI
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 15-26
270 views DOI Abstract
2011
how to measure capabilities within corridors?
;Thomas MACOUN;Ulrich LETH
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 27-34
269 views Abstract
2010
finite element modelling of contact interaction between wheel and rail with three-layered thin coating
;Vladimir KOLESNIKOV;Michail CHEBAKOV;Andrey NASEDKIN;Dmitri SUKHOV
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 119-124
269 views Abstract
2010
a comparison of microscopic traffic flow simulation systems for an urban area
;Michał MACIEJEWSKI
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 27-38
257 views Abstract
2018
influence of primary silicon precipitates on anodized aluminum alloys surface layer properties
;Krzysztof LABISZ;Jarosław KONIECZNY;Łukasz WIERZBICKI;Janusz ĆWIEK;Anna BUTOR
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 111-120
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
transportation demand management as a tool of transport policy
;Ryszard BARCIK;Leszek BYLINKO
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 121-131
28 views DOI Abstract
2017
on a fair manifold fare rating on a long traffic line
;Stanislav PALÚCH;Tomáš MAJER
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-11
924 views DOI Abstract
2017
main trends of biofuels production in ukraine
;Myroslav PANCHUK;Sviatoslav KRYSHTOPA;Liubomyr SHLAPAK;Liudmyla KRYSHTOPA;Andrii PANCHUK;Volodymyr YAROVYI;Aleksander SŁADKOWSKI
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 15-26
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
environmental assessment of road transport in a passenger car using the life cycle approach
;Piotr FOLĘGA;Dorota BURCHART-KOROL
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 147-153
235 views DOI Abstract
2016
estimation of effects caused by the implementation of park&ride system in the transport hub
;Marcin Jacek KŁOS
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 5-13
189 views DOI Abstract
2016
numerical synthesis of the track alignment and applications. part i: the synthesis method
;Mădălina DUMITRIU
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 19-28
145 views DOI Abstract
2016
prospects fixation drift sands physicochemical method
;Maujuda MUZAFFAROVA;Makhamadjan MIRAKHMEDOV
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 143-152
249 views DOI Abstract
2015
active measures as part of dialogue marketing promoting the use of public transport in rural areas
;Roman KLEMENTSCHITZ;Oliver ROIDER
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 57-75
192 views Abstract
2015
the methodology of rating quality standards in the regional passenger transport
;Vladislav ZITRICKÝ;Jozef GAŠPARÍK;Lumír PEČENÝ
Vol. 10 , No. SE , pp. 59-72
218 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,810 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.