Indexed in Journament

dermatologic therapy

ISSN 1529-8019· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #511 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 98.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name dermatol ther
Abbreviated Name dermatol ther
ISSN 1529-8019

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 70.4
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 85.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for dermatologic therapy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 70.4 26.2
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.7
Content Distribution 85.3 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
Brafv600e Mutation As A Prognostic Factor In Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.
, pp. e13270
417 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effect of different types of therapeutic trauma on vitiligo lesions.
Vol. 30 , No. 2
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
A preliminary study of fractional CO laser added to topical tacrolimus combined with 308 nm excimer lamp for refractory vitiligo.
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. e12747
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Site-oriented depigmentation in vitiligo patients using Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1,064/532 nm), cryotherapy and chemical peels: A comparative study.
, pp. e13052
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
Is skin microneedling a good alternative method of various skin defects removal.
Vol. 31 , No. 6 , pp. e12714
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Successful Guselkumab treatment in a psoriatic patient affected with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome, and prosecution during the COVID-19 pandemic.
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
An observational study on the efficacy of single injection of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria
, pp. -
182 views Abstract
2020
Successful Guselkumab treatment in a psoriatic patient affected with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome, and prosecution during the COVID-19 pandemic.
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Cross-sectional, Multi-center Study on Treatment of Facial Acne Scars With Low-Energy Double-Pass 1450-nm Diode Laser.
, pp. e13326
269 views DOI Abstract
2020
Brafv600e Mutation As A Prognostic Factor In Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.
, pp. e13270
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Therapeutic Options in Vitiligo with Special Emphasis on Immunomodulators: A Comprehensive Update with Review of Literature.
, pp. e13215
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Functional nutrition as integrated approach in vitiligo management.
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. e12625
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
A preliminary study of fractional CO laser added to topical tacrolimus combined with 308 nm excimer lamp for refractory vitiligo.
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. e12747
361 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #511 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

45.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

70.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.