Impact of selected baking and vacuum cooling parameters on the quality of toast bread
Clicks: 158
ID: 265735
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
157 views
18 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Vacuum cooling of baked goods can deliver many advantages in terms of product quality and productivity, such as higher volumes and shorter cooling times. However, the associated high costs and the need to adjust baking protocols are of relevance and more information is needed. This paper examines the influence of two main baking protocol parameters on the quality of toast bread, i.e. oven temperature and baking time reduction. Resulting toast bread characteristics including specific bread volume, concavity, browning index, crust and crumb hardness and aw-value were analysed as well as process-dependent core temperature and water loss. In order to compensate for water loss during vacuum cooling and still achieve optimal toast bread quality, a final bread core temperature of 98 °C at the end of baking gave best results, regardless of oven temperature. It was further shown that cooling time can be reduced by a factor of 10 if the baking protocol is optimally adjusted, hinting at a huge potential to increase productivity for industrial applications. In summary, it can be stated that vacuum cooling requires a tailored reduction in baking time in order to compensate for water loss from vacuum cooling while retaining sufficient structural cohesion to resist deformation of the bread.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (202 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
kinner2021journalimpact
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mathias Kinner;Ramona Rüegg;Claudia A. Weber;Jürg Buchli;Ludwig Durrer;Nadina Müller;Mathias Kinner;Ramona Rüegg;Claudia A. Weber;Jürg Buchli;Ludwig Durrer;Nadina Müller; |
| Journal | Journal of food science and technology |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1007/s13197-020-04945-x
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.