towards a consensus view on understanding nanomaterials hazards and managing exposure: knowledge gaps and recommendations

Clicks: 362
ID: 238284
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #28 of 461 articles by views in Nature Materials

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 461 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The aim of this article is to present an overview of salient issues of exposure, characterisation and hazard assessment of nanomaterials as they emerged from the consensus-building of experts undertaken within the four year European Commission coordination project NanoImpactNet. The approach adopted is to consolidate and condense the findings and problem-identification in such a way as to identify knowledge-gaps and generate a set of interim recommendations of use to industry, regulators, research bodies and funders. The categories of recommendation arising from the consensual view address: significant gaps in vital factual knowledge of exposure, characterisation and hazards; the development, dissemination and standardisation of appropriate laboratory protocols; address a wide range of technical issues in establishing an adequate risk assessment platform; the more efficient and coordinated gathering of basic data; greater inter-organisational cooperation; regulatory harmonization; the wider use of the life-cycle approaches; and the wider involvement of all stakeholders in the discussion and solution-finding efforts for nanosafety.
Reference Key
dusinska2013materialstowards Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Maria Dusinska;Thomas A. J. Kuhlbusch;Markus Berges;Teresa F. Fernandes;Richard D. Handy;Flemming Cassee;Iseult Lynch;Geoffrey Hunt;Michael Riediker
Journal Nature Materials
Year 2013
DOI
10.3390/ma6031090
URL
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/6/3/1090
Keywords
monitoring occupational health hazard nanotoxicology consensus building exposure release electronics civil engineering (general)microscopydescriptive and experimental mechanics nuclear engineeringengineering (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.