the methodological peculiarities of assessing the efficiency of the system of ensuring financial stability of credit institutions
Clicks: 647
ID: 231448
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
71.9
/100
647 views
435 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1 of 134 articles by views in journal of inorganic and organometallic polymers and materials
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 134 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article is aimed at substantiating methodological aspects of assessing the efficiency of the system of ensuring financial stability of credit institutions (SEFSCI). Complexity and multidimensionality of issues of ensuring financial stability of credit institutions allowed to allocate a number of requirements. This, in turn, led to the development of methodology to assess the efficiency of SEFSCI, using axiological, system-functional approaches and the theory of stakeholders. As a result the author describes the basic criteria of efficiency of functioning of the researched system in the context of groups of stakeholders and their basic values, to satisfaction of which should be directed measures on the part of subjects of SEFSCI. The system’s efficiency criteria were also considered in the context of the economic, social, organizational, managerial, and institutional efficiency. The latter describe the attributes of internal efficiency of SEFSCI, and the first group of criteria is more valuable in the aspect of the external efficiency diagnostics. However, both approaches are universal, concerning the possibility of their use for assessment of this system both on micro- and meso-level. Also, both approaches are complementary, and only their simultaneous use can provide a comprehensive diagnosis of the system, and hence the effectiveness of identifying both its shortcomings and the reserves of efficiency gains.
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.