avaliação comparativa entre dois métodos para determinação do colesterol em carnes e leite comparative evalution of two methods for the determination of cholesterol in meat and milk

Clicks: 362
ID: 156306
2004
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #21 of 124 articles by views in software - practice and experience

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 124 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
O presente trabalho teve como objetivo comparar duas metodologias, enzimática e por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE), na determinação dos teores de colesterol em amostras de carne bovina e leite. No método por CLAE utilizou-se coluna C18, 100 x 4,6mm x 4µm (Chromolith, Merck), fase móvel acetonitrila:isopropanol (85:15 para as amostras de carne e 95:05 para amostras de leite) e detector UV-Visível fixado a 210nm. No método enzimático, a absorbância das amostras foi lida em espectrofotômetro a 499nm, 90 minutos após a reação. Foram realizadas 10 análises de cada produto para as duas metodologias avaliadas, sendo que os resultados obtidos mostraram-se semelhantes (p>0,01). Obteve-se recuperação de 95% para as amostras de carne e 97% para as amostras de leite em ambos os métodos. Os resultados obtidos com o material de referência certificado de carne (SRM 1546, NIST) apresentaram-se semelhantes ao declarado no certificado. O coeficiente de variação nas amostras de leite foi de 0,81 e 0,82%, e nas amostras de carne 2,3 e 2,9% para as metodologias cromatográfica e enzimática, respectivamente. O método enzimático mostrou-se sensível e preciso, entretanto, ao contrário da metodologia cromatográfica, necessita de controle rigoroso das condições de análise.
The objective of this work was to compare two methods, one enzymatic and the other chromatographic using HPLC, for the determination of cholesterol in meat and milk. For the chromatographic method, a C18 column, 100 x 4.6mm, 4µm (Chromolith, Merck), was used, acetonitrile:isopropanol as the mobile phase (85:15 for samples of meat and 95:05 for samples of milk), a flow rate of 2mL/min and detection by UV-Visible at 210nm. In the enzymatic method, absorbance was read against the blank at 499nm, 90 minutes after the reaction. Each product was analyzed ten times with each methodology, the results being similar (p>0.01). The mean recovery was 95% for the meat samples and 97% for the milk samples with both methodologies. The results obtained for the meat standard reference material (SRM 1546, NIST) were similar to those declared on the certificate. The coefficients of variation for the milk samples were 0.81 and 0.82%, and for the meat samples, 2.3 and 2.9% for the chromatographic and enzymatic methods respectively. The enzymatic method was shown to be sensitive and precise, whilst, to the contrary, the chromatographic method required a rigorous control of the analytical conditions.
Reference Key
saldanha2004foodavaliao Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Tatiana Saldanha;Mônica Roberta Mazalli;Neura Bragagnolo
Journal software - practice and experience
Year 2004
DOI
10.1590/S0101-20612004000100020
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612004000100020
Keywords
meat cholesterol milk enzymatic method foods and food supplytechnology (general) método enzimático

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.