PloS one | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6 / 33,622
🥉 Good
Overall Score
65.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
84
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

PloS one

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name PLoS One
Abbreviated Name plosone
ISSN 1932-6203
Aim and Scope Types of articles PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. Systematic reviews whose methods ensure the comprehensive and unbiased sampling of existing literature. Submissions describing methods, software, databases, or other tools that meet the journal’s criteria for utility, validation and availability. Qualitative research that adheres to appropriate study design and reporting guidelines.
URL https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Author Instructions https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (2054 total)

2019
Infection dynamics of gastrointestinal helminths in sympatric non-human primates, livestock and wild ruminants in Kenya.
Obanda, Vincent;Maingi, Ndichu;Muchemi, Gerald;Ng'ang'a, Chege J;Angelone, Samer;Archie, Elizabeth A;
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. e0217929-
996 views Abstract
2016
Ecological Study of HIV Infection and Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is There a Double Burden of Disease?
Angkurawaranon, C;Nitsch, D;Larke, N;Rehman, A M;Smeeth, L;Addo, J;
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. e0166375-
896 views DOI Abstract
2014
A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis.
Ding, Xibing;Jin, Shuqing;Niu, Xiaoyin;Ren, Hao;Fu, Shukun;Li, Quan;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. e96233-
892 views Abstract
2013
Adverse respiratory health and hematological alterations among agricultural workers occupationally exposed to organophosphate pesticides: a cross-sectional study in North India.
Fareed, Mohd;Pathak, Manoj Kumar;Bihari, Vipin;Kamal, Ritul;Srivastava, Anup Kumar;Kesavachandran, Chandrasekharan Nair;
Vol. 8 , No. 7 , pp. e69755-
873 views DOI Abstract
2019
Results from e-KISS: electronic-KIOSK Intervention for Safer Sex: A pilot randomized controlled trial of an interactive computer-based intervention for sexual health in adolescents and young adults.
Shafii, Taraneh;Benson, Samantha K;Morrison, Diane M;Hughes, James P;Golden, Matthew R;Holmes, King K;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. e0209064
847 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of fluid dynamics on decellularization efficacy and mechanical properties of blood vessels.
Simsa, Robin;Vila, Xavier Monforte;Salzer, Elias;Teuschl, Andreas;Jenndahl, Lachmi;Bergh, Niklas;Fogelstrand, Per;
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. e0220743
840 views DOI Abstract
2019
Results from one-year use of an electronic Clinical Decision Support System in a post-conflict context: An implementation research.
Bernasconi, Andrea;Crabbé, Francois;Adedeji, Ajibola Margret;Bello, Attahiru;Schmitz, Torsten;Landi, Marco;Rossi, Rodolfo;
Vol. 14 , No. 12 , pp. e0225634
813 views DOI Abstract
2018
Antigenic and genetic characterization of influenza viruses isolated in Mozambique during the 2015 season.
Tivane, Almiro;Daniels, Rodney;Nguenha, Neuza;Machalele, Loira;Nacoto, Afonso;Pale, Mirela;Mateonane, Edirsse;Mavale, Sandra;Chilundo, Josina;Muteto, Délcio;Salência, Judite;Albati, Félix;Gudo, Eduardo;Mussá, Tufária;McCauley, John;
Vol. 13 , No. 7 , pp. e0201248-
800 views Abstract
2013
Genetic variability and evolutionary implications of RNA silencing suppressor genes in RNA1 of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus isolates infecting sweetpotato and related wild species.
Tugume, Arthur K;Amayo, Robert;Weinheimer, Isabel;Mukasa, Settumba B;Rubaihayo, Patrick R;Valkonen, Jari P T;
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. e81479-
799 views Abstract
2017
Predictive value of clinical and laboratory features for the main febrile diseases in children living in Tanzania: A prospective observational study
De Santis O;Kilowoko M;Kyungu E;Sangu W;Cherpillod P;Kaiser L;Genton B;D'Acremont V;;
Vol. 12 , No. 5 , pp. -
768 views Abstract
View All 2,054 Articles
65
Overall
Good
84
60
30
70
55
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

65.5/100

Tier: Good

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

83.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.