journal of food science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#60 / 33,622
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
48.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of food science

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name j food sci
Abbreviated Name j food sci
ISSN 1750-3841
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (71 total)

2020
Concentrations of heavy metals in muscle and edible offal of pork in Nanjing city of China and related health risks.
Pei, Fei;Wang, Yueying;Fang, Yong;Li, Peng;Yang, Wenjian;Ma, Ning;Ma, Gaoxing;Hu, Qiuhui;
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Pitted Olive Pomace Affected by Three Drying Technologies
Sinrod, A.
Vol. 84 , pp. 412-420
352 views DOI
2019
Preparation and Characterization of Quercetin-Loaded Zein Nanoparticles by Electrospraying and Study of In Vitro Bioavailability.
Rodríguez-Félix, Francisco;Del-Toro-Sánchez, Carmen Lizette;Javier Cinco-Moroyoqui, Francisco;Juárez, Josué;Ruiz-Cruz, Saúl;López-Ahumada, Guadalupe Amanda;Carvajal-Millan, Elizabeth;Castro-Enríquez, Daniela Denisse;Barreras-Urbina, Carlos Gregorio;Tapia-Hernández, José Agustín;
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
The Effect of Different Methods of Fermentation on the Detection of Milk Protein Residues in Retail Cheese by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).
Ivens, Katherine O;Baumert, Joseph L;Hutkins, Robert L;Taylor, Steve L;
Vol. 82 , No. 11 , pp. 2752-2758
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Elucidation of The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Vanillin In Lps-Activated THP-1 Cells.
Zhao, Dongrui;Jiang, Yunsong;Sun, Jinyuan;Li, Hehe;Huang, Mingquan;Sun, Xiaotao;Zhao, Mouming;
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Midinfrared Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Analysis, a Novel Approach to Monitor Maillard Reaction.
Mellado-Carretero, Jorge;Kaade, Wael;Ferrando, Montserrat;Güell, Carme;de Lamo-Castellví, Sílvia;
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined Approach for Determining Diuron in Sugarcane and Soil: Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Carbon Nanotube-Mediated Purification, and Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detection.
Chen, Bi;Wang, Xiaoming;
Vol. 84 , pp. 2402-2411
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Lactic Acid and Salt on Enterotoxin A Production and Growth of Staphylococcus aureus.
Elahi, Shaheem;Fujikawa, Hiroshi;
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inhibitory Effect of Epigallocatechin Gallate, Epigallocatechin, and Gallic Acid on the Formation of N-Nitrosodiethylamine In Vitro.
Deng, Sha;Jin, Jing;He, Qiang;
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interaction of Protein Isolate with Anthocyanin Extracted from Black Soybean and Its Effect on the Anthocyanin Stability.
Wang, Chen;Xie, Yanli;
288 views DOI Abstract
View All 71 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
86
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.