población y desarrollo | Journament

Journal Ranking

#221 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 hours ago

población y desarrollo

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name población y desarrollo
Abbreviated Name población y desarrollo
ISSN 2076-0531
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (94 total)

2016
a knowledge-based step length estimation method based on fuzzy logic and multi-sensor fusion algorithms for a pedestrian dead reckoning system
;Ying-Chih Lai;Chin-Chia Chang;Chia-Ming Tsai;Shih-Ching Huang;Kai-Wei Chiang
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 70-
319 views DOI Abstract
2016
One neighbor’s income is another neighbor’s envy: exploring subjective living standards in Paraguay
Ervin, Paul;Ervin, Lyliana Gayoso de;Salinas, Derlis;
Vol. 22 , No. 43 , pp. 35-44
280 views Abstract
2018
the role of social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor disabilities
;Amin Gharebaghi;Mir-Abolfazl Mostafavi;Seyed Hossein Chavoshi;Geoffrey Edwards;Patrick Fougeyrollas
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 131-
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
terrain extraction in built-up areas from satellite stereo-imagery-derived surface models: a stratified object-based approach
;Fritjof Luethje;Dirk Tiede;Clemens Eisank
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
251 views DOI Abstract
2014
rapid prototyping — a tool for presenting 3-dimensional digital models produced by terrestrial laser scanning
;Juho-Pekka Virtanen;Hannu Hyyppä;Matti Kurkela;Matti Vaaja;Petteri Alho;Juha Hyyppä
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 871-890
249 views DOI Abstract
2014
the application of webgis tools for visualizing coastal flooding vulnerability and planning for resiliency: the new jersey experience
;Richard Lathrop;Lisa Auermuller;James Trimble;John Bognar
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 408-429
243 views DOI Abstract
2016
integrated wifi/pdr/smartphone using an adaptive system noise extended kalman filter algorithm for indoor localization
;Xin Li;Jian Wang;Chunyan Liu;Liwen Zhang;Zhengkui Li
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
241 views DOI Abstract
2015
visual overlay on openstreetmap data to support spatial exploration of urban environments
;Chandan Kumar;Wilko Heuten;Susanne Boll
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 87-104
241 views DOI Abstract
2017
on data quality assurance and conflation entanglement in crowdsourcing for environmental studies
;Didier G. Leibovici;Julian F. Rosser;Crona Hodges;Barry Evans;Michael J. Jackson;Chris I. Higgins
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 78-
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
collaborative strategies for sustainable eu flood risk management: foss and geospatial tools—challenges and opportunities for operative risk analysis
;Raffaele Albano;Leonardo Mancusi;Aurelia Sole;Jan Adamowski
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 2704-2727
234 views DOI Abstract
View All 94 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.