applied computer science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#411 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

applied computer science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name applied computer science
Abbreviated Name applied computer science
ISSN 1895-3735
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (157 total)

2016
glycaemic control and associated self-management behaviours in diabetic outpatients: a hospital based observation study in lusaka, zambia
;Emmanuel Mwila Musenge;Charles Michelo;Boyd Mudenda;Alexey Manankov
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
565 views DOI Abstract
2016
CHARACTERISTICS OF PRODUCTS MADE OF 17-4PH STEEL BY MEANS OF 3D PRINTING METHOD
WALCZAK, Mariusz;GĄSKA, Daniel;GUZIK, Mirosław;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 29-36
532 views Abstract
2015
effectiveness of a nurse-managed protocol to prevent hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients with diabetes
;Giuseppe Marelli;Fausto Avanzini;Giuseppe Iacuitti;Enrico Planca;Ilaria Frigerio;Giovanna Busi;Liliana Carlino;Laura Cortesi;Maria Carla Roncaglioni;Emma Riva
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
484 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effects of probiotic soymilk fortified with omega-3 on blood glucose, lipid profile, haematological and oxidative stress, and inflammatory parameters in streptozotocin nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats
;Mohsen Mohammadi Sartang;Seyed Mohammad Mazloomi;Nader Tanideh;Abbas Rezaian Zadeh
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
423 views DOI Abstract
2016
relationship of hemoglobin a1c with β cell function and insulin resistance in newly diagnosed and drug naive type 2 diabetes patients
;Xinguo Hou;Jinbo Liu;Jun Song;Chuan Wang;Kai Liang;Yu Sun;Zeqiang Ma;Weifang Yang;Chengqiao Li;Xiuping Zhang;Peng Lin;Lei Gong;Meijian Wang;Fuqiang Liu;Wenjuan Li;Fei Yan;Jun Qin;Lingshu Wang;Jidong Liu;Ruxing Zhao;Shihong Chen;Li Chen
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
421 views DOI Abstract
2016
the association of retinopathy and plasma glucose and hba1c: a validation of diabetes diagnostic criteria in a chinese population
;Rui Zhang;Yufeng Li;Simin Zhang;Xiaoling Cai;Xianghai Zhou;Linong Ji
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
418 views DOI Abstract
2016
microflora disturbance during progression of glucose intolerance and effect of sitagliptin: an animal study
;Xinfeng Yan;Bo Feng;Peicheng Li;Zhaosheng Tang;Lin Wang
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
400 views DOI Abstract
2017
the increased circulating plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with type 1 diabetes do not correlate to metabolic control
;Kailash Singh;Stellan Sandler;Daniel Espes
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
391 views DOI Abstract
2013
reduction of methylglyoxal-induced glycation by pyridoxamine improves adipose tissue microvascular lesions
;Tiago Rodrigues;Paulo Matafome;Daniela Santos-Silva;Cristina Sena;Raquel Seiça
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
352 views DOI Abstract
2016
high glucose-induced oxidative stress mediates apoptosis and extracellular matrix metabolic imbalances possibly via p38 mapk activation in rat nucleus pulposus cells
;Xiaofei Cheng;Bin Ni;Feng Zhang;Ying Hu;Jie Zhao
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
340 views DOI Abstract
View All 157 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.