chinese chemical letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#411 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

chinese chemical letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name chinese chemical letters
Abbreviated Name chinese chemical letters
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2018
beyond weight loss: establishing a postbariatric surgery patient support group—what do patients want?
;Saira Hameed;Victoria Salem;Tricia M. Tan;Alma Collins;Krishna Shah;Samantha Scholtz;Ahmed R. Ahmed;Harvinder Chahal
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
460 views DOI Abstract
2012
intervening to reduce sedentary behaviors and childhood obesity among school-age youth: a systematic review of randomized trials
;May May Leung;Alen Agaronov;Kateryna Grytsenko;Ming-Chin Yeh
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
405 views DOI Abstract
2014
feasibility and acceptability of an early childhood obesity prevention intervention: results from the healthy homes, healthy families pilot study
;Akilah Dulin Keita;Patricia M. Risica;Kelli L. Drenner;Ingrid Adams;Gemma Gorham;Kim M. Gans
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
404 views DOI Abstract
2014
associations between aspects of friendship networks, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour among adolescents
;Keri Jo Sawka;Gavin R. McCormack;Alberto Nettel-Aguirre;Anita Blackstaffe;Rosemary Perry;Penelope Hawe
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
366 views DOI Abstract
2011
community-specific bmi cutoff points for south indian females
;K. B. Kishore Mohan;V. Sapthagirivasan;M. Anburajan
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
363 views DOI Abstract
2013
platelet counts and liver enzymes after bariatric surgery
;Hans-Erik Johansson;Arvo Haenni;Björn Zethelius
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
344 views DOI Abstract
2010
sagittal abdominal diameter as a screening tool in clinical research: cutoffs for cardiometabolic risk
;U. Risérus;U. de Faire;L. Berglund;M.-L. Hellénius
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
324 views DOI Abstract
2017
changes in the microrna profile observed in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
;Carmela Nardelli;Laura Iaffaldano;Vincenzo Pilone;Giuseppe Labruna;Maddalena Ferrigno;Nicola Carlomagno;Concetta Anna Dodaro;Pietro Forestieri;Pasqualina Buono;Francesco Salvatore;Lucia Sacchetti
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
322 views DOI Abstract
2010
changes in theory-based psychological factors predict weight loss in women with class iii obesity initiating supported exercise
;James J. Annesi;Srinivasa Gorjala
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
257 views DOI Abstract
2013
changes in body composition, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and eating behavior after an intensive lifestyle intervention with high volume of physical activity in severely obese subjects: a prospective clinical controlled trial
;Kjersti Karoline Danielsen;Mette Svendsen;Sverre Mæhlum;Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
230 views DOI Abstract
View All 83 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.