international journal of quantum chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#366 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 день назад

international journal of quantum chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
scopus ulakbim sci
Краткое название international journal of quantum chemistry
Сокращённое название international journal of quantum chemistry
ISSN 0
Цели и охват
URL
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (133 total)

2019
Noncovalent interactions in inorganic supramolecular chemistry based in heavy metals. Quantum chemistry point of view
Barrientos L.
Vol. 119 , pp. 0-0
343 views DOI
2016
a global scale mechanistic model of photosynthetic capacity (luna v1.0)
;A. A. Ali;C. Xu;A. Rogers;R. A. Fisher;S. D. Wullschleger;E. C. Massoud;J. A. Vrugt;J. D. Muss;N. G. McDowell;J. B. Fisher;P. B. Reich;C. J. Wilson
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 587-606
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
Exploring the catalytic efficiency of X-doped (X=B, N, P) graphene in oxygen reduction reaction: Influence of solvent and border effects
Fernando Aguilar-Galindo,Pilar Ocón,Jose M. Lopez Poyato;Fernando Aguilar-Galindo;Pilar Ocón;Jose M. Lopez Poyato;
Vol. 118 , No. 14 , pp. e25579-
218 views DOI
2014
decoupling the effects of clear atmosphere and clouds to simplify calculations of the broadband solar irradiance at ground level
;A. Oumbe;Z. Qu;P. Blanc;M. Lefèvre;L. Wald;S. Cros
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 1661-1669
211 views DOI Abstract
2017
accelerating volcanic ash data assimilation using a mask-state algorithm based on an ensemble kalman filter: a case study with the lotos-euros model (version 1.10)
;G. Fu;H. X. Lin;A. Heemink;S. Lu;A. Segers;N. van Velzen;T. Lu;S. Xu
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 1751-1766
202 views DOI Abstract
2015
the software architecture of climate models: a graphical comparison of cmip5 and emicar5 configurations
;K. Alexander;S. M. Easterbrook
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 1221-1232
200 views DOI Abstract
2018
estimating criteria pollutant emissions using the california regional multisector air quality emissions (ca-remarque) model v1.0
;C. B. Zapata;C. Yang;S. Yeh;J. Ogden;M. J. Kleeman
Vol. 11 , pp. 1293-1320
198 views DOI Abstract
2014
long residence times of rapidly decomposable soil organic matter: application of a multi-phase, multi-component, and vertically resolved model (bams1) to soil carbon dynamics
;W. J. Riley;F. Maggi;M. Kleber;M. S. Torn;J. Y. Tang;D. Dwivedi;N. Guerry
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 1335-1355
189 views DOI Abstract
2017
representing nighttime and minimum conductance in clm4.5: global hydrology and carbon sensitivity analysis using observational constraints
;D. L. Lombardozzi;M. J. B. Zeppel;R. A. Fisher;A. Tawfik
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 321-331
188 views DOI Abstract
2015
modelling of primary aerosols in the chemical transport model mocage: development and evaluation of aerosol physical parameterizations
;B. Sič;L. El Amraoui;V. Marécal;B. Josse;J. Arteta;J. Guth;M. Joly;P. D. Hamer
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 381-408
184 views DOI Abstract
View All 133 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.