the software architecture of climate models: a graphical comparison of cmip5 and emicar5 configurations
Clicks: 245
ID: 208417
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
245 views
27 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 133 articles by views in international journal of quantum chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We analyze the source code of eight coupled climate models, selected from
those that participated in the CMIP5 (Taylor et al., 2012) or EMICAR5
(Eby et al., 2013;
Zickfeld et al., 2013) intercomparison projects. For each model, we
sort the preprocessed code into components and subcomponents based on
dependency structure. We then create software architecture diagrams that show
the relative sizes of these components/subcomponents and the flow of data
between them. The diagrams also illustrate several major classes of climate
model design; the distribution of complexity between components, which
depends on historical development paths as well as the conscious goals of
each institution; and the sharing of components between different modeling
groups. These diagrams offer insights into the similarities and differences
in structure between climate models, and have the potential to be useful
tools for communication between scientists, scientific institutions, and the
public.
| Reference Key |
alexander2015geoscientificthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;K. Alexander;S. M. Easterbrook |
| Journal | international journal of quantum chemistry |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.5194/gmd-8-1221-2015
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.