Computers in biology and medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#173 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
43
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

Computers in biology and medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Comput Biol Med
Abbreviated Name comput biol med
ISSN 1879-0534
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (87 total)

2020
Autodetect extracranial and intracranial artery stenosis by machine learning using ultrasound.
Hsu, Kai-Cheng;Lin, Ching-Heng;Johnson, Kory R;Liu, Chi-Hung;Chang, Ting-Yu;Huang, Kuo-Lun;Fann, Yang-Cheng;Lee, Tsong-Hai;
Vol. 116 , pp. 103569
846 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacoinformatics-based identification of potential bioactive compounds against Ebola virus protein VP24.
Kwofie, Samuel K;Broni, Emmanuel;Teye, Joshua;Quansah, Erasmus;Issah, Ibrahim;Wilson, Michael D;Miller, Whelton A;Tiburu, Elvis K;Bonney, Joseph H K;
Vol. 113 , pp. 103414
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reducing demand uncertainty in the platelet supply chain through artificial neural networks and ARIMA models.
Fanoodi, Bahareh;Malmir, Behnam;Jahantigh, Farzad Firouzi;
Vol. 113 , pp. 103415
359 views DOI Abstract
1996
Automatic analysis of the control of metabolic networks.
Bayram, M;
Vol. 26 , No. 5 , pp. 401-8
351 views Abstract
2019
ipcwswitch: An R package for inverse probability of censoring weighting with an application to switches in clinical trials.
Grafféo, Nathalie;Latouche, Aurélien;Le Tourneau, Christophe;Chevret, Sylvie;
Vol. 111 , pp. 103339
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plug and play self-configurable IoT gateway node for telemonitoring of ECG.
Koya, Aneesh M;Deepthi, P P;
Vol. 112 , pp. 103359
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detecting connectivity in EEG: A comparative study of data-driven effective connectivity measures.
Bakhshayesh, Hanieh;Fitzgibbon, Sean P;Janani, Azin S;Grummett, Tyler S;Pope, Kenneth J;
Vol. 111 , pp. 103329
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mixed impact of torsion on LV hemodynamics: A CFD study based on the Chimera technique.
Canè, Federico;Selmi, Matteo;De Santis, Gianluca;Redaelli, Alberto;Segers, Patrick;Degroote, Joris;
Vol. 112 , pp. 103363
297 views DOI Abstract
2018
Prediction of venous thromboembolism using semantic and sentiment analyses of clinical narratives.
Sabra, Susan;Mahmood Malik, Khalid;Alobaidi, Mazen;
Vol. 94 , pp. 1-10
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation and benchmarking of level set-based three forces via geometric active contours for segmentation of white blood cell nuclei shape.
Al-Dulaimi, Khamael;Tomeo-Reyes, Inmaculada;Banks, Jasmine;Chandran, Vinod;
Vol. 116 , pp. 103568
281 views DOI Abstract
View All 87 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
43
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

42.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.