Detecting connectivity in EEG: A comparative study of data-driven effective connectivity measures.
Clicks: 310
ID: 12069
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
64.9
/100
309 views
248 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
In this paper, we perform the first comparison of a large variety of effective connectivity measures in detecting causal effects among observed interacting systems based on their statistical significance. Well-known measures estimating direction and strength of interdependence between time series are compared: information theoretic measures, model-based multivariate measures in the time and frequency domains, and phase-based measures. The performance of measures is tested on simulated data from three systems: three coupled Hénon maps; a multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model with and without EEG as an exogenous input; and simulated EEG. No measure was consistently superior. Measures that model the data as MVAR perform well when the data are drawn from that model. Frequency domain measures perform well when the data have a clearly defined band of interest. When neither of these is true, information theoretic measures perform well. Overall, the measure with the best performance in a variety of situations and with a low computational cost is conditional Granger causality. Partial Granger causality and multivariate Granger causality are also good measures, but their computational cost rises rapidly with the number of channels. Copula Granger causality can also be used reliably, but its computational cost rises rapidly with the number of data.
| Reference Key |
bakhshayesh2019detectingcomputers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bakhshayesh, Hanieh;Fitzgibbon, Sean P;Janani, Azin S;Grummett, Tyler S;Pope, Kenneth J; |
| Journal | Computers in biology and medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0010-4825(19)30198-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.