Bioprocess and biosystems engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#483 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

Bioprocess and biosystems engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
Abbreviated Name bioprocess biosyst eng
ISSN 1615-7605
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (47 total)

2019
Valorization of mutant Bacillus licheniformis M09 supernatant for green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: photocatalytic dye degradation, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity.
Momin, Bilal;Rahman, Shakeelur;Jha, Neetu;Annapure, Uday S;
468 views DOI Abstract
2014
Biodegradation of chestnut shell and lignin-modifying enzymes production by the white-rot fungi Dichomitus squalens, Phlebia radiata.
Dong, Ya-Chen;Dai, Yi-Ning;Xu, Teng-Yang;Cai, Jin;Chen, Qi-He;
Vol. 37 , No. 5 , pp. 755-64
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative life cycle assessment of autotrophic cultivation of Scenedesmus dimorphus in raceway pond coupled to biodiesel and biogas production.
Mediboyina, Maneesh Kumar;Banuvalli, Bhavana Karibasappa;Chauhan, Vikas Singh;Mudliar, Sandeep Narayan;
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
Bacterial exopolysaccharides as a modern biotechnological tool for modification of fungal laccase properties and metal ion binding
Osińska-Jaroszuk, M.
Vol. 41 , pp. 973-989
294 views DOI
2019
Regulation of different electron acceptors on petroleum hydrocarbon biotransformation to final products in activated sludge biosystems
Zhao, L.
Vol. 42 , pp. 643-655
288 views DOI
2017
a construção de um programa de letramento informacional e arte educação
;Alexandra César Zinn;Kelley Cristine Gonçalves Dias Gasque
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 171-188
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative efficacy of machine-learning models in prediction of reducing uncertainties in biosurfactant production.
Jovic, Srdjan;Guresic, Dejan;Babincev, Ljiljana;Draskovic, Nenad;Dekic, Vidosav;
281 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimization of immobilization conditions for Lactobacillus penntosus cells.
Wang, Jianfei;Huang, Jiaqi;Guo, Huanyu;Jiang, Shaoming;Zhang, Jing;Ning, Yuchen;Fang, Mudannan;Liu, Shijie;
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adaptive identification of anaerobic digestion process for biogas production management systems.
Yoshida, Kazuto;Kametani, Keita;Shimizu, Naoto;
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reconstruction, verification and in-silico analysis of a genome-scale metabolic model of bacterial cellulose producing Komagataeibacter xylinus.
Rezazadeh, Mohammad;Babaeipour, Valiollah;Motamedian, Ehsan;
270 views DOI Abstract
View All 47 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.