applied computational intelligence and soft computing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#418 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 hours ago

applied computational intelligence and soft computing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name applied computational intelligence and soft computing
Abbreviated Name applied computational intelligence and soft computing
ISSN 1687-9724
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (88 total)

2017
türkiye’de coğrafya eğitimi alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin (2006-2017) eğilimleri / the trends of postgraduate theses (2006-2017) on geography education in turkey
;Taner Çifçi
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 864-887
553 views DOI Abstract
2017
an investigation into self-translation
;Natalia Vasilevna Maklakova;Ekaterina Sergeevna Khovanskaya;Leona L. Grigorieva
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 1260-1267
461 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of photography in conceptual art in iranian artists
;Fereshteh Dianat
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 831-847
444 views DOI Abstract
2018
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin bilgi kaynakları / knowledge sources of university students
;İsmail Acun;Cemil Yücel;Gökhan Demirhan
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 595-608
397 views DOI Abstract
2018
Concepts, Methods, and Performances of Particle Swarm Optimization, Backpropagation, and Neural Networks
Zajmi, Leke;Ahmed, Falah Y. H.;Jaharadak, Adam Amril;Zajmi, Leke;Ahmed, Falah Y. H.;Jaharadak, Adam Amril;
Vol. 2018
386 views DOI Abstract
2012
Multilevel Cognitive Machine-Learning-Based Concept for Artificial Awareness: Application to Humanoid Robot Awareness Using Visual Saliency
Madani, Kurosh;Ramik, Dominik M.;Sabourin, Cristophe;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
343 views Abstract
2017
sözden yazıya, yinelemeden hatırlamaya, ritüelden estetiğe devam eden anlatı / narrative continuing from oral to text, repetition to memory, ritual to aesthetics
;M. Emir İlhan
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 385-394
337 views DOI Abstract
2018
Performance Assessment of Multiple Classifiers Based on Ensemble Feature Selection Scheme for Sentiment Analysis
Ghosh, Monalisa;Sanyal, Goutam;Ghosh, Monalisa;Sanyal, Goutam;
Vol. 2018
328 views DOI Abstract
2017
cemal halvetî (ö. 899/1494)’nin etvâr-ı seb‘a anlayışının sûfî psikolojisi açısından tahlili / the analysis of jamal khalwati’s (d. 899/1494) al-atvar al-seb’a with regard to sufi psychology
;İbrahim Işıtan
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 680-696
314 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Theoretical Framework
Abdulgader, Fathia Sghayer;Eid, Rajeh;Daneshvar Rouyendegh, Babak;Abdulgader, Fathia Sghayer;Eid, Rajeh;Daneshvar Rouyendegh, Babak;
Vol. 2018
305 views DOI Abstract
View All 88 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.