clinical microbiology reviews | Journament

Journal Ranking

#336 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

clinical microbiology reviews

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name clin microbiol rev
Abbreviated Name clin microbiol rev
ISSN 1098-6618
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

1997
Yersinia pestis--etiologic agent of plague
Perry RD;Fetherston JD;;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
519 views Abstract
2010
Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis
Brouwer MC;Tunkel AR;van de Beek D;;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. -
354 views Abstract
2019
Pathobionts Associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, Hengameh Chloé;Vallance, Bruce Andrew;Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki;Petersen, Andreas Munk;
Vol. 32 , No. 2
305 views DOI Abstract
1995
Hyperimmune globulins in prevention and treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infections
Hemming VG;Prince GA;Groothuis JR;Siber GR;;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
300 views Abstract
1999
Respiratory syncytial virus infection: immune response, immunopathogenesis, and treatment
Domachowske JB;Rosenberg HF;;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
290 views Abstract
2008
Epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of recurrent bacterial meningitis
Tebruegge M;Curtis N;;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. -
269 views Abstract
2019
Erratum: Correction for Kraft et al., "A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults" (Clinical microbiology reviews (2019) 32 3 PII: e00128-19)
Kraft, C.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
263 views DOI
2011
Microbiology of animal bite wound infections
Abrahamian FM;Goldstein EJ;;
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
1999
Genital herpes: review of the epidemic and potential use of type-specific serology
Ashley RL;Wald A;;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
2015
Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections
Crump JA;Sjölund-Karlsson M;Gordon MA;Parry CM;;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. -
245 views Abstract
View All 25 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.