european journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#289 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

european journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name eur j orthop surg traumatol
Abbreviated Name eur j orthop surg traumatol
ISSN 1633-8065
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2016
serial crystallography captures enzyme catalysis in copper nitrite reductase at atomic resolution from one crystal
;Sam Horrell;Svetlana V. Antonyuk;Robert R. Eady;S. Samar Hasnain;Michael A. Hough;Richard W. Strange
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 271-281
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold.
Sundaram, Kavin;Warren, Jared;Anis, Hiba K;Klika, Alison K;Piuzzi, Nicolas S;
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Negative prognostic factors in surgical treatment for trimalleolar fractures
Testa G;Ganci M;Amico M;Papotto G;Giardina SMC;Sessa G;Pavone V;;
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. -
302 views Abstract
2015
sub-atomic resolution x-ray crystallography and neutron crystallography: promise, challenges and potential
;Matthew P. Blakeley;Samar S. Hasnain;Svetlana V. Antonyuk
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 464-474
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Volar PEEK plate for distal radius fracture: analysis of adverse events.
Tarallo, Luigi;Giorgini, Andrea;Novi, Michele;Zambianchi, Francesco;Porcellini, Giuseppe;Catani, Fabio;
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients.
Migliorini, Filippo;Rath, Björn;Tingart, Markus;Meisen, Nadine;Eschweiler, Jörg;
274 views DOI Abstract
2018
crystal structure of peroxiredoxin 3 from vibrio vulnificus and its implications for scavenging peroxides and nitric oxide
;Jinsook Ahn;Kyung Ku Jang;Inseong Jo;Hasan Nurhasni;Jong Gyu Lim;Jin-Wook Yoo;Sang Ho Choi;Nam-Chul Ha
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 82-92
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
mix-and-diffuse serial synchrotron crystallography
;Kenneth R. Beyerlein;Dennis Dierksmeyer;Valerio Mariani;Manuela Kuhn;Iosifina Sarrou;Angelica Ottaviano;Salah Awel;Juraj Knoska;Silje Fuglerud;Olof Jönsson;Stephan Stern;Max O. Wiedorn;Oleksandr Yefanov;Luigi Adriano;Richard Bean;Anja Burkhardt;Pontus Fischer;Michael Heymann;Daniel A. Horke;Katharina E. J. Jungnickel;Elena Kovaleva;Olga Lorbeer;Markus Metz;Jan Meyer;Andrew Morgan;Kanupriya Pande;Saravanan Panneerselvam;Carolin Seuring;Aleksandra Tolstikova;Julia Lieske;Steve Aplin;Manfred Roessle;Thomas A. White;Henry N. Chapman;Alke Meents;Dominik Oberthuer
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 769-777
271 views DOI Abstract
2015
solving coiled-coil protein structures
;Zbigniew Dauter
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 164-165
252 views DOI
2015
advanced ensemble modelling of flexible macromolecules using x-ray solution scattering
;Giancarlo Tria;Haydyn D. T. Mertens;Michael Kachala;Dmitri I. Svergun
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 207-217
238 views DOI Abstract
View All 40 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.