Disability and rehabilitation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#250 / 33,809
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 52 minutes ago

Disability and rehabilitation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Disabil Rehabil
Abbreviated Name disabil rehabil
ISSN 1464-5165
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (231 total)

2019
Virtual reality and video games in cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review.
García-Bravo, Sara;Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia;Campuzano-Ruiz, Raquel;López-Navas, María Jesús;Domínguez-Paniagua, Joaquín;Araújo-Narváez, Aurora;Barreñada-Copete, Estrella;García-Bravo, Cristina;Flórez-García, Mariano Tomás;Botas-Rodríguez, Javier;Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto;
, pp. 1-10
390 views DOI Abstract
2015
crystal structure of bis(2,2′-bipyridine-κ2n,n′)bis(thiocyanato-κn)manganese(ii) 2,2′-bipyridine monosolvate
;Stefan Suckert;Inke Jess;Christian Näther
Vol. 71 , No. 1 , pp. m3-m4
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sources of income following a rejected disability pension application: a sequence analysis study.
Perhoniemi, Riku;Blomgren, Jenni;Laaksonen, Mikko;
, pp. 1-9
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using a dyadic approach to explore parental support for physical activity among young cancer survivors.
Price, Jenson;Wurz, Amanda;Ramphal, Raveena;Wilson, Kathleen;Brunet, Jennifer;
, pp. 1-9
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disclosure and workplace accommodations for people with autism: a systematic review.
Lindsay, Sally;Osten, Victoria;Rezai, Mana;Bui, Sunny;
, pp. 1-14
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation, roles, and responsibilities of Filipino occupational therapists in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.
Ching, Peñafrancia E;Lazaro, Rolando T;
, pp. 1-8
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Addressing intimate partner violence with female patients with chronic physical disabilities: the role of physical therapists.
Ballan, Michelle S;Freyer, Molly;
, pp. 1-6
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychosocial working conditions and the subjective prognosis of gainful employment among employees with asthma: a cross-sectional study.
Heinrichs, Katherina;Hummel, Stefan;Gholami, Jalal;Schultz, Konrad;Wild, Burkhard;Li, Jian;Sheikh, Aziz;Loerbroks, Adrian;
, pp. 1-8
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using Rasch and factor analysis to develop a Proxy-Reported health state classification (descriptive) system for Cerebral Palsy.
Bahrampour, Mina;Downes, Martin;Boyd, Roslyn N;Scuffham, Paul A;Byrnes, Joshua;
, pp. 1-9
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
crystal structure of 5-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-3-(4-methylphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1h-pyrazole-1-carbaldehyde
;Farook Adam;Seranthimata Samshuddin;Nadiah Ameram;Subramaya;Laxminarayana Samartha
Vol. 71 , No. 12 , pp. o1031-o1032
331 views DOI Abstract
View All 231 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.