journal of veterinary research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#437 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 hours ago

journal of veterinary research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j vet res
Abbreviated Name j vet res
ISSN 2450-7393
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (73 total)

2011
the results of diagnostic laparoscopy examinations - an 8 - years experience
;İlker Arıkan;Aykut Barut;Müge Harma;Mehmet İbrahim Harma;Şener Gezer
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. -
412 views Abstract
2017
assesment of endometrial vascularization with immunohistochemical cd34 assay in recurrent pregnancy loss: a case control study
;Emine Aydın;Taner Usta
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 70-73
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Changes in the Activity of Ovine Blood-derived Macrophages Stimulated with Antimicrobial Peptide Extract (AMP) or Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP).
Wessely-Szponder, Joanna;Szponder, Tomasz;Bobowiec, Ryszard;Michalska, Joanna;
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 235-242
371 views DOI Abstract
2016
beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and uterine artery doppler measurements for the prediction of success of single dose methotrexate treatment in tubal ectopic pregnancies
;Kılıç Çiğdem;Mehmet Metin Altay;Tuğba Kınay;Metin Kaplan;Serap Fırtına Tuncer;Enis Özkaya;Ahmet Okyar Erol;Orhan Gelişen
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. -
366 views DOI Abstract
2007
predictors of cord blood leptin level in pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction and in normal pregnancies
;Nilgün Öztürk Doğan;Serdar Yalvaç;Eray Çalışkan;Asuman Erten;İsmail Dölen;Ali Haberal
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. -
319 views Abstract
2019
Protective Role of Propolis on Low and High Dose Furan-induced Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Rats.
Kaya, Emre;Yılmaz, Seval;Ceribasi, Songul;
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 423-431
316 views DOI Abstract
2012
clinical significance of discordance between fetal biparietal diameter and femur length
;Enis Özkaya;Eralp Başer;Erhan Okuyan;Caner Çakır;Vakkas Korkmaz;Tuncay Küçüközkan
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. -
291 views Abstract
2016
does pelvic organ prolapse relate with expulsion of intrauterine devices?
;Mehmet Çınar;Rıfat Taner Aksoy;Aytekin Tokmak;Selçuk Erkılınç;Ali İrfan Güzel;Özlem Gün Eryılmaz;Yasemin Taşçı
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. -
280 views DOI Abstract
2010
the effect of maternal smoking on the height, weight and apgar scores of the newborn and on placental parameters
;Sinan Karadeniz;Metin Altay;Yeşim Bayoğlu Tekin;Necdet Kocabıyık;Hasan Ozan;Orhan Gelişen
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. -
278 views Abstract
2010
cord blood leptin levels in gestational diabetes
;Özlem Şengül;Tamer Mungan;Evrim Erdemoğlu;Göksel İslamoğlu;Füsun Cantürk
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
278 views Abstract
View All 73 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.