fungal genetics and biology : fg & b | Journament

Journal Ranking

#256 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

fungal genetics and biology : fg & b

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name fungal genet biol
Abbreviated Name fungal genet biol
ISSN 1096-0937
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2016
effects of self-care health behaviors on quality of life mediated by cardiovascular risk factors among individuals with coronary artery disease: a structural equation modeling approach
;Sukhee Ahn, RN, PhD;Rhayun Song, RN, PhD;Si Wan Choi, MD, PhD
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 158-163
418 views DOI Abstract
2015
transtheoretical model-based nursing intervention on lifestyle change: a review focused on intervention delivery methods
;Joo Yun Lee, RN;Hyeoun-Ae Park, PhD, RN;Yul Ha Min, PhD, RN
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 158-167
381 views DOI Abstract
2015
clinical experiences as related to standard precautions compliance among nursing students: a focus group interview based on the theory of planned behavior
;Kyung Mi Kim, RN, PhD, ICAPN;Hyunjin Oh, RN, PhD
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 109-114
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
QTL mapping of mycelial growth and aggressiveness to distinct hosts in Ceratocystis pathogens.
Fourie, Arista;van der Nest, Magriet A;de Vos, Lieschen;Wingfield, Michael J;Wingfield, Brenda D;Barnes, Irene;
Vol. 131 , pp. 103242
346 views DOI Abstract
2018
Identification and functional analysis of the aspergillic acid gene cluster in Aspergillus flavus.
Lebar, Matthew D;Cary, Jeffrey W;Majumdar, Rajtilak;Carter-Wientjes, Carol H;Mack, Brian M;Wei, Qijian;Uka, Valdet;De Saeger, Sarah;Diana Di Mavungu, José;
Vol. 116 , pp. 14-23
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
Piperine inhibits aflatoxin B1 production in Aspergillus flavus by modulating fungal oxidative stress response.
Caceres, Isaura;El Khoury, Rhoda;Bailly, Sylviane;Oswald, Isabelle P;Puel, Olivier;Bailly, Jean-Denis;
Vol. 107 , pp. 77-85
328 views DOI Abstract
2016
difficulties of portuguese patients following acute myocardial infarction: predictors of readmissions and unchanged lifestyles
;Sofia Nunes, PhD;Guilhermina Rego, PhD;Rui Nunes, PhD
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 150-157
328 views DOI Abstract
2015
factors affecting mobility in community-dwelling older koreans with chronic illnesses
;Hye-A Yeom, PhD, RN, ANP-C;Carol M. Baldwin, PhD, RN, AHN-BC, FAAN;Myung-Ah Lee, MD, PhD;Su-Jeong Kim, RN, MS
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 7-13
320 views DOI Abstract
2014
effect of mentoring program on ways of coping with stress and locus of control for nursing students
;Satı Demir, RN, PhD;Sevil Güler Demir, RN, PhD;Hülya Bulut, RN, PhD;Filiz Hisar, RN, PhD
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 254-260
318 views DOI Abstract
2007
effects of nutrition education and exercise programs on perceived dietary behaviors, food intake and serum lipid profiles in elderly korean women living in residential homes
;Hee-Seon Kim, PhD;Kyung-Ja June, RN, PhD;Rhayun Song, RN, PhD
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 35-47
306 views DOI Abstract
View All 37 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.