Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#334 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 hours ago

Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Plant Foods Hum Nutr
Abbreviated Name plant foods hum nutr
ISSN 1573-9104
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2015
Evaluation of Minerals, Phytochemical Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Mexican, Central American, and African Green Leafy Vegetables.
Jiménez-Aguilar, Dulce M;Grusak, Michael A;
Vol. 70 , No. 4 , pp. 357-64
439 views DOI Abstract
2014
treatment efficiency by means of a nonthermal plasma combined with heterogeneous catalysis of odoriferous volatile organic compounds emissions from the thermal drying of landfill leachates
;Daniel Almarcha;Manuel Almarcha;Elena Jimenez-Coloma;Laura Vidal;Montserrat Puigcercós;Iban Barrutiabengoa
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemical Composition and Anti-Nutritional Profiling of Wattle (Acacia cyclops, Acacia microbotrya and Acacia victoriae) Seed Originating from Western Australia.
Chong, Wei Shan Cassandra;Dykes, Gary A;Coorey, Ranil;
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Beta-Glucan as Wall Material in Encapsulation of Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) Extract.
Sobieralska, Małgorzata;Kurek, Marcin Andrzej;
294 views DOI Abstract
1993
Improvement of the traditional method of ogiri production and identification of the micro-organisms associated with the fermentation process
Nwosu CD;Ojimelukwe PC;;
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. -
278 views Abstract
2016
determination of the transport properties of structural concrete using ac impedance spectroscopy techniques
;Lipeng Wu;Peng Dai;Yong Li
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bioactive Compounds and Pharmacological Potential of Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Seeds - A Review.
Fourati, Mariam;Smaoui, Slim;Hlima, Hajer Ben;Elhadef, Khaoula;Braïek, Olfa Ben;Ennouri, Karim;Mtibaa, Ahlem Chakchouk;Mellouli, Lotfi;
260 views DOI Abstract
2013
two types of distributed cfar detection based on weighting functions in fusion center for weibull clutter
;Amir Zaimbashi
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
2013
planar monopoles with different radiator shapes for uwb body-centric wireless communications
;Y. Y. Sun;S. W. Cheung;T. I. Yuk
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2016
the mechanical properties of the concrete using metakaolin additive and polymer admixture
;Adel Al Menhosh;Yan Wang;Yu Wang
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
218 views DOI Abstract
View All 42 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
50
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.