molecular catalysis | Journament

Journal Ranking

#538 / 33,805
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 2 horas

molecular catalysis

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus
Nome Abreviado molecular catalysis
Nome Abreviado molecular catalysis
ISSN 24688231
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (56 total)

2019
Unravel the surface active sites on Cu/MgLaO solid base catalyst by DRIFT spectroscopy and adsorption techniques for the synthesis of triazoles by click reaction
Bilakanti, V.
Vol. 476 , pp. 0-0
343 views DOI
2019
Selective two-step synthesis of 2,5-diformylfuran from monosaccharide, disaccharide, and polysaccharide using H-Beta and octahedral MnO<inf>2</inf> molecular sieves
Sarmah B.
, pp. 92-103
332 views DOI
2019
New insight into the synergistic promotion effect of phosphorus and molybdenum on the ceria-titanium catalysts for superior SCR performance
Zhang, G.
Vol. 478 , pp. 0-0
314 views DOI
2019
NCN-Pincer palladium complexes immobilized on MCM-41 molecular sieve: Application in Α-arylation reactions
Kai W.
, pp. 85-91
310 views DOI
2019
A new triazine-thiophene based porous organic polymer as efficient catalyst for the synthesis of chromenes via multicomponent coupling and catalyst support for facile synthesis of HMF from carbohydrates
Das S.
Vol. 475 , pp. 0-0
280 views DOI
2018
Divergent synthesis of flavones and aurones via base-controlled regioselective palladium catalyzed carbonylative cyclization
Xu S.
Vol. 452 , pp. 264-270
274 views DOI
2020
CuO grafted triazine functionalized covalent organic framework as an efficient catalyst for C-C homo coupling reaction
Das, S.
Vol. 480 , pp. 0-0
181 views DOI
2015
l’évolution du statut de la femme marocaine dans la civilisation, ma mère !... de driss chraïbi et dans amour sorcier de tahar ben jelloun : liberté du choix ou choix de liberté?
;Ramona Mielusel
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 139-152
174 views Abstract
2012
althusser en haïti. de port-au-prince au polder marie-anne
;Marie-Anne Paveau
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 10-15
161 views Abstract
2014
ronsard et la verve licencieuse
;Sangoul Ndong
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 123-132
153 views Abstract
View All 56 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.