macromolecular bioscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#12 / 33,798
⭐ Average
Overall Score
50.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

macromolecular bioscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name macromol biosci
Abbreviated Name macromol biosci
ISSN 1616-5195
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (380 total)

2015
mitochondrial protection by the mixed muscarinic/σ1 ligand anavex2-73, a tetrahydrofuran derivative, in aβ25-35 peptide-injected mice, a nontransgenic alzheimer's disease model
Vol. 8 , pp. -
337 views DOI Abstract
2015
extracellular environment contribution to astrogliosis – lessons learned from a tissue engineered 3d model of the glial scar
Vol. 9 , pp. -
323 views DOI Abstract
2016
systemic radical scavenger treatment of a mouse model of rett syndrome: merits and limitations of the vitamin e derivative trolox
Vol. 10 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
2012
implications of aneuploidy for stem cell biology and brain therapeutics
Vol. 6 , pp. -
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
mir-142-3p regulates bdnf expression in activated rodent microglia through its target camk2a
Vol. 14 , pp. -
298 views DOI Abstract
2015
exploring the role of microglia in mood disorders associated with experimental multiple sclerosis
Vol. 9 , pp. -
298 views DOI Abstract
2012
a comparison of serotonin neuromodulation of mouse spinal v2a interneurons using perforated patch and whole cell recording techniques
Vol. 6 , pp. -
294 views DOI Abstract
2015
non-additive modulation of synaptic transmission by serotonin, adenosine, and cholinergic modulators in the sensory thalamus
Vol. 9 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2013
early gene expression changes in spinal cord from sod1g93a amyotrophic lateral sclerosis animal model
Vol. 7 , pp. -
289 views DOI Abstract
2013
role of hormones and neurosteroids in epileptogenesis
Vol. 7 , pp. -
288 views DOI Abstract
50
Overall
Average
31
15
30
70
32
100
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

50.0/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.