aaps pharmscitech | Journament

Journal Ranking

#155 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 41 minutes ago

aaps pharmscitech

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name aaps pharmscitech
Abbreviated Name aaps pharmscitech
ISSN 1530-9932
Aim and Scope
AAPS PharmSciTech (ISSN: 1530-9932) is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed. We invite submissions under the following article types: Original Research Articles Reviews and Mini-reviews White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials Meeting Reports Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications Regulatory Notes Tutorials Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences
URL https://www.aaps.org/education-and-research/journals/aaps-pharmscitech
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 04, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (79 total)

2019
QbD-Based Development of Cationic Self-nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems of Paclitaxel with Improved Biopharmaceutical Attributes.
Beg, Sarwar;Kaur, Ravinder;Khurana, Rajneet Kaur;Rana, Vikas;Sharma, Teenu;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 118
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanosized Transferosome-Based Intranasal In Situ Gel for Brain Targeting of Resveratrol: Formulation, Optimization, In Vitro Evaluation, and In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study.
Salem, Heba F;Kharshoum, Rasha M;Abou-Taleb, Heba A;Naguib, Demiana M;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 181
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Stimuli Responsive In Situ Gelling Systems Loaded with PLGA Nanoparticles of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride for Effective Treatment of Periodontitis.
Beg, Sarwar;Dhiman, Shashi;Sharma, Teenu;Jain, Ashish;Sharma, Rakesh Kumar;Jain, Atul;Singh, Bhupinder;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 76
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chitosan-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Optimization of Photodynamic Therapy: a Review.
Calixto, Giovana Maria Fioramonti;de Annunzio, Sarah Raquel;Victorelli, Francesca Damiani;Frade, Maria Lucia;Ferreira, Paula Scanavez;Chorilli, Marlus;Fontana, Carla Raquel;
Vol. 20 , No. 7 , pp. 253
344 views DOI Abstract
2013
imaging comparison between 18f-fdg-pet/ct and 18f-flouroethyl choline pet/ct in rare case of thymus carcinoma exhibiting a positive choline uptake
;Mustafa Takesh;Stefan Adams
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combination of Colloidal Silicon Dioxide with Spray-Dried Solid Dispersion to Facilitate Discharge from an Agitated Dryer.
Lee, Yung-Chi;McNevin, Michael;Ikeda, Craig;Chouzouri, Georgia;Moser, Justin;Harris, David;Howell, Logan;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 182
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
Impact of Porous Excipients on the Manufacturability and Product Performance of Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.
Beringhs, André O'Reilly;Minatovicz, Bruna Cristina;Zhang, Geoff G Z;Chaudhuri, Bodhisattwa;Lu, Xiuling;
Vol. 19 , No. 7 , pp. 3298-3310
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
successful use of a multidisciplinary approach to treat a perforated duodenal malignant lymphoma in an elderly patient
;Tomoko Takagishi;Yuta Niimi;Goshi Matsuki;Shinta Nagano;Junsuke Hinami;Masaaki Kajiwara;Kiyoshi Kaneko;Yoshihiro Kubota;Osamu Nakai
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality by Design Enabled Development of Oral Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of a Novel Calcimimetic Cinacalcet HCl Using a Porous Carrier: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterisation.
Panigrahi, Kahnu Charan;Patra, Ch Niranjan;Rao, M E Bhanoji;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 216
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of Orodispersible Films Containing Benzydamine Hydrochloride Using a Modified Solvent Casting Method.
Pechová, Veronika;Gajdziok, Jan;Muselík, Jan;Vetchý, David;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 2509-2518
287 views DOI Abstract
View All 79 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.