Talanta | Journament

Journal Ranking

#359 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 23 hours ago

Talanta

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Talanta
Abbreviated Name talanta
ISSN 1873-3573
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (391 total)

2017
Incorporation of zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8)-derived nanoporous carbons in methacrylate polymeric monoliths for capillary electrochromatography.
Carrasco-Correa, Enrique Javier;Martínez-Vilata, Andrea;Herrero-Martínez, José Manuel;Parra, José B;Maya, Fernando;Cerdà, Victor;Cabello, Carlos Palomino;Palomino, Gemma Turnes;Svec, Frantisek;
Vol. 164 , pp. 348-354
504 views DOI Abstract
2018
Two 3-hydroxyflavone derivatives as two-photon fluorescence turn-on chemosensors for cysteine and homocysteine in living cells.
Wu, Qianqian;Wang, Kangnan;Wang, Zian;Sun, Yatong;Cao, Duxia;Liu, Zhiqiang;Guan, Ruifang;Zhao, Songfang;Yu, Xueying;
Vol. 181 , pp. 118-124
419 views DOI Abstract
2005
Use of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate room temperature ionic liquids as chelate extraction solvent with 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(2-thienyl)-1,3-butanedione
Naoki Hirayama;Mika Deguchi;Hitomi Kawasumi;Takaharu Honjo
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. 255 - 260
414 views DOI Abstract
2014
Green aspects, developments and perspectives of liquid phase microextraction techniques.
Spietelun, Agata;Marcinkowski, Łukasz;de la Guardia, Miguel;Namieśnik, Jacek;
Vol. 119 , pp. 34-45
403 views DOI Abstract
2012
examination of market structure in selected livestock agri-food chains in the czech republic
;Lenka Rumánková
Vol. 60 , No. 7 , pp. 243-258
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
The SPE-assisted europium (III) based complex fluorometric assay for the highly selective and sensitive detection of manganese (II) in water.
He, Jiaqi;Zhi, Hui;Hu, Qi;Meng, Hu;Wang, Jihui;Feng, Liang;
Vol. 210 , pp. 120633
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
A novel electrochemical sensor based on ion imprinted polymer and gold nanomaterials for nitrite ion analysis in exhaled breath condensate.
Diouf, Alassane;El Bari, Nezha;Bouchikhi, Benachir;
Vol. 209 , pp. 120577
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fabrication of silver-coated gold nanoparticles to simultaneously detect multi-class insecticide residues in peach with SERS technique
Yaseen T.
Vol. 196 , pp. 537-545
375 views DOI
2018
New MS network analysis pattern for the rapid identification of constituents from traditional Chinese medicine prescription Lishukang capsules in vitro and in vivo based on UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS.
Li, Zhihong;Guo, Xiaomin;Cao, Zhonglian;Liu, Xiujie;Liao, Xueling;Huang, Chao;Xu, Wenqi;Liu, Li;Yang, Ping;
Vol. 189 , pp. 606-621
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
Solid-phase microextraction of heavy metals in natural water with a polypyrrole/carbon nanotube/1, 10–phenanthroline composite sorbent material
Rohanifar A.
Vol. 188 , pp. 570-577
365 views DOI
View All 391 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.