restorative neurology and neuroscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#410 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

restorative neurology and neuroscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name restor neurol neurosci
Abbreviated Name restor neurol neurosci
ISSN 1878-3627
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
350 views DOI Abstract
2015
Quercetin ameliorates hypobaric hypoxia-induced memory impairment through mitochondrial and neuron function adaptation via the PGC-1α pathway.
Liu, Peng;Zou, Dan;Yi, Long;Chen, Mingliang;Gao, Yanxiang;Zhou, Rui;Zhang, Qianyong;Zhou, Yong;Zhu, Jundong;Chen, Ka;Mi, Mantian;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 143-57
299 views DOI Abstract
2015
grounded theory and action research as pillars for interpretive information systems research: a comparative study
;Manal A. Abdel-Fattah
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 309-327
235 views DOI Abstract
2017
parametric comparison of emds algorithm with some symmetric cryptosystems
;Mani Arora;Sandeep Sharma;Derick Engles
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
233 views DOI Abstract
2011
evaluation comparison of some ad hoc networks routing protocols
;A.A.A. Radwan;T.M. Mahmoud;E.H. Houssein
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 95-106
214 views DOI Abstract
2016
classification of clustered microcalcifications using mlffbp-ann and
;Baljit Singh Khehra;Amar Partap Singh Pharwaha
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 11-20
202 views DOI Abstract
2013
srfid: a hash-based security scheme for low cost rfid systems
;Walid I. Khedr
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 89-98
198 views DOI Abstract
2012
alternate mutation based artificial immune algorithm for step fixed charge transportation problem
;Mahmoud Moustafa El-Sherbiny
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 123-134
198 views DOI Abstract
2014
intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based topsis method for multi-criteria decision making
;Deepa Joshi;Sanjay Kumar
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 97-104
193 views DOI Abstract
2013
ceai: ccm-based email authorship identification model
;Sarwat Nizamani;Nasrullah Memon
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 239-249
193 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.