communications in computer and information science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3002 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

communications in computer and information science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name communications in computer and information science
Abbreviated Name communications in computer and information science
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/series/7899
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (475 total)

2005
atividade muscular durante a marcha após acidente vascular encefálico muscle activity during gait following stroke
Vol. 63 , No. 3b , pp. 847-851
529 views DOI Abstract
2011
lipoic acid effects on glutamate and taurine concentrations in rat hippocampus after pilocarpine-induced seizures
Vol. 69 , No. 2b , pp. 360-364
462 views DOI Abstract
2007
reconhecimento olfativo nos transtornos invasivos do desenvolvimento smell recognition in pervasive developmental disorders
Vol. 65 , No. 4b , pp. 1200-1205
450 views DOI Abstract
2011
quantitative electroencephalography power and coherence measurements in the diagnosis of mild and moderate alzheimer's disease
Vol. 69 , No. 2b , pp. 297-303
405 views DOI Abstract
2008
cortical stimulation of language fields under local anesthesia: optimizing removal of brain lesions adjacent to speech areas mapeamento cortical da fala com o paciente acordado: optimização para ressecção de lesões intracranianas localizadas próximas a área da fala
Vol. 66 , No. 3a , pp. 534-538
397 views DOI Abstract
2006
phobias, other psychiatric comorbidities and chronic migraine fobias, outras comorbidades psiquiátricas e enxaqueca crônica
Vol. 64 , No. 4 , pp. 950-953
393 views DOI Abstract
2007
clinical assessment of patients with primary and postparalytic hemifacial spasm: a retrospective study análise clínica de pacientes com espasmo hemifacial primário e pós-paralítico: estudo retrospectivo
Vol. 65 , No. 3b , pp. 783-786
376 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.