Indexed in Journament

australasian journal on ageing

ISSN 1741-6612· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2/100
Journament Score
#9,508
Journament Rank
8
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name australas j ageing
Abbreviated Name australasian journal on ageing
ISSN 1741-6612

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2019
Pilot feasibility study of a home-based fall prevention exercise program (StandingTall) delivered through a tablet computer (iPad) in older people with dementia.
Taylor, Morag E;Close, Jacqueline C T;Lord, Stephen R;Kurrle, Susan E;Webster, Lyndell;Savage, Roslyn;Delbaere, Kim;
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Uniting generations: A research protocol examining the impacts of an intergenerational learning program on participants and organisations.
Golenko, Xanthe;Radford, Katrina;Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke;Vecchio, Nerina;Cartmel, Jennifer;Harris, Neil;
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
The influence of age and overweight or obesity on foot sensitivity and postural control: A systematic review.
Andreato, Leonardo Vidal;de Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini;Follmer, Bruno;Bertolini, Sônia Maria Marques Gomes;
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
A national survey of aged care facility managers’ views of preparedness for natural disasters relevant to residents with dementia
Schnitker, L.
Vol. 38 , pp. 182-189
282 views DOI
2019
Organising care, practice and participative research: Papers from the cognitive decline partnership centre
Biggs, S.
Vol. 38 , pp. 3-5
279 views DOI
2014
Development of the quality of australian nursing documentation in aged care (QANDAC) instrument to assess paper-based and electronic resident records
Wang, N.
Vol. 33 , pp. E18-E24
261 views DOI
2020
Patterns of hospital utilisation in the lead up to a diagnosis of dementia: A longitudinal retrospective study of hospital dementia patients in Australia
Cappetta, K.
, pp. 0-0
241 views DOI
2025
Effectiveness of technological interventions on psychosocial well-being and perception of technological interventions among people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.
Lau, Terence Kenneth; Tse, Man-Kei; Liu, Yaqin; Leung, Angela Y M
Vol. 44 , pp. e70034
69 views DOI Abstract
2025
Effectiveness of technological interventions on psychosocial well-being and perception of technological interventions among people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.
Lau, Terence Kenneth; Tse, Man-Kei; Liu, Yaqin; Leung, Angela Y M
Vol. 44 , pp. e70034
69 views DOI Abstract
2020
Patterns of hospital utilisation in the lead up to a diagnosis of dementia: A longitudinal retrospective study of hospital dementia patients in Australia
Cappetta, K.
, pp. 0-0
241 views DOI
2020
The influence of age and overweight or obesity on foot sensitivity and postural control: A systematic review.
Andreato, Leonardo Vidal;de Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini;Follmer, Bruno;Bertolini, Sônia Maria Marques Gomes;
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Uniting generations: A research protocol examining the impacts of an intergenerational learning program on participants and organisations.
Golenko, Xanthe;Radford, Katrina;Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke;Vecchio, Nerina;Cartmel, Jennifer;Harris, Neil;
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
A national survey of aged care facility managers’ views of preparedness for natural disasters relevant to residents with dementia
Schnitker, L.
Vol. 38 , pp. 182-189
282 views DOI
2019
Organising care, practice and participative research: Papers from the cognitive decline partnership centre
Biggs, S.
Vol. 38 , pp. 3-5
279 views DOI
2019
Pilot feasibility study of a home-based fall prevention exercise program (StandingTall) delivered through a tablet computer (iPad) in older people with dementia.
Taylor, Morag E;Close, Jacqueline C T;Lord, Stephen R;Kurrle, Susan E;Webster, Lyndell;Savage, Roslyn;Delbaere, Kim;
405 views DOI Abstract
2014
Development of the quality of australian nursing documentation in aged care (QANDAC) instrument to assess paper-based and electronic resident records
Wang, N.
Vol. 33 , pp. E18-E24
261 views DOI
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.