journal of theoretical and applied information technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#982 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

journal of theoretical and applied information technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of theoretical and applied information technology
Abbreviated Name journal of theoretical and applied information technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.jatit.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (135 total)

2011
Full relationship among e-satisfaction, e-trust, e-service quality, and e-loyalty: The case of Iran e-banking
Ghane, S.
Vol. 33 , pp. 1-6
332 views
2018
Tree based static multi hop leach (TBSMH-Leach) energy efficient routing protocol: A novel graph theoretical approach
Zanoon, N.
Vol. 96 , pp. 8445-8461
283 views
2007
energia e meio ambiente no brasil energy and environment in brazil
;José Goldemberg;Oswaldo Lucon
Vol. 21 , No. 59 , pp. 7-20
272 views DOI Abstract
2005
um aspecto da diversidade cultural do caboclo amazônico: a religião
;Raymundo Heraldo Maués
Vol. 19 , No. 53 , pp. 259-274
267 views DOI Abstract
2015
A new approach of web attacks classification for testing security tools at the application level
Abouelmehdi K.
Vol. 72 , pp. 347-354
266 views
2010
alexandre rodrigues ferreira e a formação do pensamento social na amazônia
;José Nailton Leite;Cecília Sayonara G. Leite
Vol. 24 , No. 68 , pp. 273-289
260 views DOI Abstract
2008
religião e nação na europa no século xix: algumas notas comparativas religion and nation in europe in the 19th century: some comparative notes
;Heinz-Gerhard Haupt
Vol. 22 , No. 62 , pp. 77-94
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
Exploring the use of computer assisted audit techniques and its impact to the transparency and accountability of financial statements
Widuri, R.
Vol. 95 , pp. 7058-7068
234 views
2012
os relatos do caminho-morte: etnografia e tradução de poéticas ameríndias tales of the way of death: ethnography and the translation of amerindian poetry
;Pedro de Niemeyer Cesarino
Vol. 26 , No. 76 , pp. 75-100
222 views DOI Abstract
2020
The implication of the European union’s general data protection regulation (GDPR) on the global data privacy
Aseri, A.M.
Vol. 98 , pp. 692-702
213 views
View All 135 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.