Indexed in Journament

Military Medicine

ISSN 1930-613X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,816 of 29,298 scored journals (34,028 indexed)
86 Articles
Scores higher than 90.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Military Medicine
Abbreviated Name mil med
ISSN 1930-613X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 90.0
Diversity 18.5
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 26.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Military Medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 18.5 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 6.0
Content Distribution 26.0 89.5
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (86)

2018
Relationship Between Spiritual Well-being and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in United States Air Force Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Intelligence Personnel.
Vol. 183 , No. 9-10 , pp. e489-e493
526 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated With Better Cardiometabolic Health and Lower PTSD Severity in Post-9/11 Veterans.
496 views DOI Abstract
2020
It Totally Possibly Could Be: How a Group of Military Physicians Reflect on Their Clinical Reasoning in the Presence of Contextual Factors.
Vol. 185 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. 575-582
454 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Operative Burden of General Surgical Disease and Non-Battle Injury in a Deployed Military Treatment Facility in Afghanistan.
Vol. 181 , No. 9 , pp. 1065-8
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diffusion Tensor Tractrography Visualizes Partial Nerve Laceration Severity as Early as 1 Week After Surgical Repair in a Rat Model Ex Vivo.
Vol. 185 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. 35-41
390 views DOI Abstract
2020
Army Physician Career Satisfaction Based on a Medical Corps Survey.
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Variation in Bariatric Surgery Costs and Complication Rates in the Military Health System.
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Understanding How Clinicians Use a New Web-based Tool for Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices for the Treatment of PTSD: The PTSD Clinicians Exchange.
Vol. 185 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. 286-295
352 views DOI Abstract
2014
OnabotulinumtoxinA successfully used as migraine prophylaxis during pregnancy: a case report
Vol. 179 , No. 6 , pp. -
345 views Abstract
2026
Impact of Laser Vision Correction on Readiness and Operational Performance Among Active Duty Service Members
DOI Abstract
2026
Who Is Caring for Male Veterans with Breast Cancer? A National Analysis of Surgical Burden Within the Veterans Health Administration
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Colophony Detection in Military Footwear and Its Implications for the Management of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Soldiers
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Informal Caregiving in Australian Veteran Families: Economic Costs, Caregiver Burden, and Health-Related Quality of Life Spillover Effects
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Environmental Epidemiology in Military Populations: Summary and Conclusions of the First Military Environmental Epidemiology Symposium
27 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,816 of 29,298 scored
(34,028 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

18.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.