Indexed in Journament

Military Medicine

ISSN 1930-613X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,436 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
76 Articles
Scores higher than 95.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Military Medicine
Abbreviated Name mil med
ISSN 1930-613X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 90.0
Diversity 33.3
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 24.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 90.0 5.8
Diversity 33.3 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 24.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (76)

2018
Relationship Between Spiritual Well-being and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in United States Air Force Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Intelligence Personnel.
Wood, Joe D;Ware, Catherine M;Correll, Terry;Heaton, John E;McBride, Teg;Haynes, Jared T;
Vol. 183 , No. 9-10 , pp. e489-e493
478 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated With Better Cardiometabolic Health and Lower PTSD Severity in Post-9/11 Veterans.
Whitworth, James W;Hayes, Scott M;Andrews, Ryan J;Fonda, Jennifer R;Beck, Brigitta M;Hanlon, Lilly B;Fortier, Catherine B;Milberg, William P;McGlinchey, Regina E;
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bangladesh Fistula Mission Partnership: Leveraging Assets from the United States Agency for International Development and the Department of Defense to Address a Health Care Crisis in a Developing Nation.
Gehrich, Alan P;Dietrich, Charles;Licina, Derek;Satin, Marietou;Ahmed, Sanjib;Huda, Nazmul;
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
It Totally Possibly Could Be: How a Group of Military Physicians Reflect on Their Clinical Reasoning in the Presence of Contextual Factors.
Konopasky, Abigail;Ramani, Divya;Ohmer, Megan;Battista, Alexis;Artino, Anthony R;McBee, Elexis;Ratcliffe, Temple;Durning, Steven J;
Vol. 185 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. 575-582
405 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Operative Burden of General Surgical Disease and Non-Battle Injury in a Deployed Military Treatment Facility in Afghanistan.
Hollingsworth, Andrew C;Bowley, Douglas M;Lundy, Jonathan B;
Vol. 181 , No. 9 , pp. 1065-8
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diffusion Tensor Tractrography Visualizes Partial Nerve Laceration Severity as Early as 1 Week After Surgical Repair in a Rat Model Ex Vivo.
Farinas, Angel F;Manzanera Esteve, Isaac V;Pollins, Alonda C;Cardwell, Nancy L;Does, Mark D;Dortch, Richard D;Thayer, Wesley P;
Vol. 185 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. 35-41
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Army Physician Career Satisfaction Based on a Medical Corps Survey.
Wojcik, Barbara E;Stein, Catherine R;Guerrero, Kenzi;Hosek, Brandon J;Humphrey, Rebecca J;Soderdahl, Douglas W;
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Variation in Bariatric Surgery Costs and Complication Rates in the Military Health System.
Luan, William Patrick;Leroux, Todd C;Olsen, Cara;Robb, Douglas;Skinner, Jonathan S;Richard, Patrick;
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
Understanding How Clinicians Use a New Web-based Tool for Disseminating Evidence-Based Practices for the Treatment of PTSD: The PTSD Clinicians Exchange.
Coleman, Julia L;Marceau, Lisa;Zincavage, Rebekah;Magnavita, Ashley M;Ambrosoli, James;Shi, Ling;Simon, Erica;Ortigo, Kile;Clarke-Walper, Kristina;Penix, Elizabeth;Wilk, Joshua;Ruzek, Josef I;Rosen, Raymond C;
Vol. 185 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. 286-295
313 views DOI Abstract
2014
OnabotulinumtoxinA successfully used as migraine prophylaxis during pregnancy: a case report
Robinson AY;Grogan PM;;
Vol. 179 , No. 6 , pp. -
298 views Abstract
2026
Predictors of Providers’ Intention to Use a Military-Adapted Assessment Tool for Adjustment Disorder
Jouhayna Bajjani‐Gebara, Margaux F. Keller, Madison F Clark, Ryan R. Landoll, Joan Wasserman
DOI Abstract
2026
From Damage Control Resuscitation to Prolonged Care in Ukraine: Evolution of a Small Unit Training Program, 2023-2025
Tom Mallinson, Anna Onderková, Sean Keenan, Aebhric O’Kelly, Vladyslav Chumachenko, Anastasiia Chumachenko, Mykhailo Tielieshev, Antonina Nifantieva, Vitaly Shevel, John Quinn
DOI Abstract
2026
Mapping the Evidence for Operator Syndrome Among Special Operations Forces: A Scoping Review
Tara Caberwal, Amy Cecchini, Cristóbal S. Berry-Cabán
DOI Abstract
2026
The Scales Have Tipped: U.S. Marine Corps Boot Camp Increases Muscle Mass and Reduces Body Fat in Recruits
Emily Kloss, Daniel Bennett, Andrea C. Givens, Brenda Niederberger, Laura Palombo, Karen R. Kelly
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Integrating Ketamine and Autogenic Training for Chronic Pain: A Case Study at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Julia G Carlson, O. Gbade-Alabi, Darren D Love, Jessica Richards
36 views DOI Abstract
2026
Potential Marker of Accelerated Aging: Worsening of Gait Speed in Post-9/11 Veterans in the TRACTS Longitudinal Cohort
Elisa F. Ogawa, James W. Whitworth, Michelle M. Pebole, Anna Etchin, Dylan Katz, Madeleine K. Nowak, William Milberg, Catherine B. Fortier
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: The Silent Service: Identifying Under-Recognized Young Military Caregivers
15 views DOI
2026
Bigger Is Not Always Better: Computational Efficiency in Lexical Prehospital Triage Modeling
Aaron C. Weidman, Chase Zikmund, Leonard Weiss, Francis X Guyette, Ronald K. Poropatich, David D. Salcido
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Implementation of a High-Reliability Organization Framework in a Large Integrated Health Care System: A Pre–Post Quasi-Experimental Quality Improvement Project
25 views DOI
2026
Modernizing Aeromedical Standards for Crohn’s Disease: A Risk-Stratified, Evidence-Informed Proposal for Waiver Reform
Jake Cresta, J. Kwan, Stephanie Tamayo, Benjamin Fiore
26 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,436 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

24.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.