Indexed in Journament

journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry

ISSN 1468-330X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #9,730 of 33,995 indexed journals
15 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name j neurol neurosurg psychiatry
Abbreviated Name j neurol neurosurg psychiatry
ISSN 1468-330X

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2006
Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. -
408 views Abstract
2014
Tracking the progression of social cognition in neurodegenerative disorders.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1076-83
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and assessment of the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R.
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
Vol. 90 , No. 9 , pp. 1059-1067
365 views DOI Abstract
2008
Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms and updating orientation in patients with vestibular disease.
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 276-83
358 views Abstract
2019
Latitude continues to be significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: an updated meta-analysis.
336 views DOI Abstract
2001
The Tolosa-Hunt syndrome
Vol. 71 , No. 5 , pp. -
326 views Abstract
2020
Performance validity test failure in clinical populations-a systematic review.
Vol. 91 , No. 9 , pp. 945-952
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Concussion and long-term cognitive impairment among professional or elite sport-persons: a systematic review.
315 views DOI Abstract
2000
Frataxin point mutations in two patients with Friedreich's ataxia and unusual clinical features.
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 661-4
312 views Abstract
2020
Performance validity test failure in clinical populations-a systematic review.
Vol. 91 , No. 9 , pp. 945-952
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Concussion and long-term cognitive impairment among professional or elite sport-persons: a systematic review.
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
Vol. 90 , No. 9 , pp. 1059-1067
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unravelling of the paroxysmal dyskinesias.
Vol. 90 , No. 2 , pp. 227-234
144 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and assessment of the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R.
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lipid-related genetic polymorphisms significantly modulate the association between lipids and disability progression in multiple sclerosis.
Vol. 90 , No. 6 , pp. 636-641
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Latitude continues to be significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: an updated meta-analysis.
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
Tracking the progression of social cognition in neurodegenerative disorders.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1076-83
398 views DOI Abstract
2008
Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms and updating orientation in patients with vestibular disease.
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 276-83
358 views Abstract
2006
Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. -
408 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #9,730 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.