Indexed in Journament

journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry

ISSN 1468-330X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #585 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 98% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j neurol neurosurg psychiatry
Abbreviated Name j neurol neurosurg psychiatry
ISSN 1468-330X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 83.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 83.2 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2006
Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians
Morgan JC;Iyer SS;Moser ET;Singer C;Sethi KD;;
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
2014
Tracking the progression of social cognition in neurodegenerative disorders.
Kumfor, Fiona;Irish, Muireann;Leyton, Cristian;Miller, Laurie;Lah, Suncica;Devenney, Emma;Hodges, John R;Piguet, Olivier;
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1076-83
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and assessment of the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R.
Bakker, Leonhard A;Schröder, Carin D;Tan, Harold H G;Vugts, Simone M A G;van Eijk, Ruben P A;van Es, Michael A;Visser-Meily, Johanna M A;van den Berg, Leonard H;
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
Martin, Sarah-Jane;McGlasson, Sarah;Hunt, David;Overell, James;
Vol. 90 , No. 9 , pp. 1059-1067
378 views DOI Abstract
2008
Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms and updating orientation in patients with vestibular disease.
Jáuregui-Renaud, K;Sang, F Y P;Gresty, M A;Green, D A;Bronstein, A M;
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 276-83
375 views Abstract
2019
Latitude continues to be significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: an updated meta-analysis.
Simpson, Steve;Wang, Wendy;Otahal, Peter;Blizzard, Leigh;van der Mei, Ingrid A F;Taylor, Bruce V;
346 views DOI Abstract
2001
The Tolosa-Hunt syndrome
Kline LB;Hoyt WF;;
Vol. 71 , No. 5 , pp. -
344 views Abstract
2020
Performance validity test failure in clinical populations-a systematic review.
McWhirter, Laura;Ritchie, Craig W;Stone, Jon;Carson, Alan;
Vol. 91 , No. 9 , pp. 945-952
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Concussion and long-term cognitive impairment among professional or elite sport-persons: a systematic review.
Gallo, Valentina;Motley, Kim;Kemp, Simon P T;Mian, Saba;Patel, Tara;James, Laura;Pearce, Neil;McElvenny, Damien;
324 views DOI Abstract
2000
Frataxin point mutations in two patients with Friedreich's ataxia and unusual clinical features.
McCormack, M L;Guttmann, R P;Schumann, M;Farmer, J M;Stolle, C A;Campuzano, V;Koenig, M;Lynch, D R;
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 661-4
323 views Abstract
2020
Performance validity test failure in clinical populations-a systematic review.
McWhirter, Laura;Ritchie, Craig W;Stone, Jon;Carson, Alan;
Vol. 91 , No. 9 , pp. 945-952
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Concussion and long-term cognitive impairment among professional or elite sport-persons: a systematic review.
Gallo, Valentina;Motley, Kim;Kemp, Simon P T;Mian, Saba;Patel, Tara;James, Laura;Pearce, Neil;McElvenny, Damien;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
Martin, Sarah-Jane;McGlasson, Sarah;Hunt, David;Overell, James;
Vol. 90 , No. 9 , pp. 1059-1067
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unravelling of the paroxysmal dyskinesias.
Erro, Roberto;Bhatia, Kailash P;
Vol. 90 , No. 2 , pp. 227-234
152 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and assessment of the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R.
Bakker, Leonhard A;Schröder, Carin D;Tan, Harold H G;Vugts, Simone M A G;van Eijk, Ruben P A;van Es, Michael A;Visser-Meily, Johanna M A;van den Berg, Leonard H;
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lipid-related genetic polymorphisms significantly modulate the association between lipids and disability progression in multiple sclerosis.
Zhang, Yan;Zhou, Yuan;van der Mei, Ingrid A F;Simpson, Steve;Ponsonby, Anne-Louise;Lucas, Robyn M;Tettey, Prudence;Charlesworth, Jac;Kostner, Karam;Taylor, Bruce V;, ;
Vol. 90 , No. 6 , pp. 636-641
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
Latitude continues to be significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: an updated meta-analysis.
Simpson, Steve;Wang, Wendy;Otahal, Peter;Blizzard, Leigh;van der Mei, Ingrid A F;Taylor, Bruce V;
346 views DOI Abstract
2014
Tracking the progression of social cognition in neurodegenerative disorders.
Kumfor, Fiona;Irish, Muireann;Leyton, Cristian;Miller, Laurie;Lah, Suncica;Devenney, Emma;Hodges, John R;Piguet, Olivier;
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1076-83
410 views DOI Abstract
2008
Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms and updating orientation in patients with vestibular disease.
Jáuregui-Renaud, K;Sang, F Y P;Gresty, M A;Green, D A;Bronstein, A M;
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 276-83
375 views Abstract
2006
Botulinum toxin A during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians
Morgan JC;Iyer SS;Moser ET;Singer C;Sethi KD;;
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
Journament Score
43.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #585 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.