peerj computer science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1289 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

peerj computer science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name peerj computer science
Abbreviated Name peerj computer science
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2016
DAE Tools: equation-based object-oriented modelling, simulation and optimisation software
Nikolić, Dragan D.;
Vol. 2 , pp. e54-
386 views Abstract
2015
PAME: plasmonic assay modeling environment
Hughes, Adam;Liu, Zhaowen;Reeves, Mark E.;
Vol. 1 , pp. e17-
367 views Abstract
2005
the pine processionary moth in the pinewoods of calabrian apennines, italy
;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 345-357
329 views
2016
Multiple comparative metagenomics using multiset k-mer counting
Benoit, Gaëtan;Peterlongo, Pierre;Mariadassou, Mahendra;Drezen, Erwan;Schbath, Sophie;Lavenier, Dominique;Lemaitre, Claire;
Vol. 2 , pp. e94-
322 views Abstract
2015
Auditory interfaces in automated driving: an international survey
Bazilinskyy, Pavlo;Winter, Joost de;
Vol. 1 , pp. e13-
310 views Abstract
2019
A rotation and translation invariant method for 3D organ image classification using deep convolutional neural networks
Islam, Kh Tohidul;Wijewickrema, Sudanthi;O’Leary, Stephen;
Vol. 5 , pp. e181-
291 views Abstract
2009
influence of thinnings on wood production in a turkey oak (quercus cerris l.) in southern italy
;La Marca O;Notarangelo G
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 173-185
288 views DOI Abstract
2008
identification of a system of ecologically homogeneous areas and of priority intervention levels for forest plantation planning in sicily
;Pizzurro GM;Maetzke F;Cullotta S;La Mantia T;La Mela Veca DS
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 280-295
276 views DOI Abstract
2007
dynamics and structure of natural regeneration in three high elevation lter area in the dolomites (north-eastern alps, italy)
;Soraruf L;Carrer M
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 177-193
259 views Abstract
2014
phenology and distribution of italian populations of thaumastocoris peregrinus carpintero and dellapé (heteroptera: thaumastocoridae)
;Sasso R;Mughini G;Laudonia S
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 105-115
255 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.